Count042

joined 4 years ago
[–] Count042@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

And why do you believe that they're attacking civilians at random instead of ships that match the specifications they've given for their blockade?

EDIT: And no, I disagree with your assertion they are attacking civilians at random.

The fact that you intentionally misread my disagreement at that to pithily call me a Zionist is just bad rhetoric designed to appeal to people that already agree with you. Good job defending genocide. (See what I did there?)

EDIT 2: The two actions that have done the most harm against Israel is Hezbollah's support front that targeted Israel's sensors for Iron dome that displaced up to 100,000 Israeli's in the north, And Yemens blockade that has incredibly damaged Israels economy to almost the breaking point and bankrupted the Eilat port.

You're not against the genocide, you're just against anything that is effective against it. I hope you get help.

You also still haven't sourced the "Attacking civilians" claim that you seem to want to use to attack me personally.

Also, what do you think the US would do to a civilian ship in international waters that the US believes is carrying Iranian Oil? What do you think they'd do if the cargo ship ignored the USN in international waters and refused to allow boarding operations?

EDIT 3: Do you think the blockade of merchant ships in the US Civil War was ineffective? Do you think that the USN firing upon civilian merchant ships trying to take cotton to the UK was morally wrong?

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What's wrong with owning a ship in Liberia?

Do you think most ships 'Owned in Liberia' are owned by Liberian citizens?

Gave an example where the Houthis attacked and killed people on a ship that had nothing to do with Israel.

Who owned the ship? Don't insult my intelligence and say Liberia.

When you cry racism about every thing is loses meaning.

This isn't everything. It's an intentional racist term intended to delegitimize a government by equating it with a select group of people. There. You learned something today.

Or should I start calling every Israeli a Netanyahu, every American a Kennedy, and every British person a Starmer?

'The Kennedy's seized another oil tanker on international waters today claiming it contained Iranian oil'

Does that seem like an okay headline to you?

EDIT: Maybe you'd like being called a Kennedy. Maybe Bushie would be a better example for you.

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Goddamn.

I thought about replying to the wall of text that was entirely lies but just got tired at the thought.

Well done.

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

'Owned in Liberia'

I like how you stuck that in the middle. Just trying to sneak it in a bunch of other stuff that is unquestionable.

You know that that isn't clever, right?

It's obvious what you are doing, and why.

I guess I shouldn't expect better from someone using the racist term 'Houthis' for the government of Yemen.

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This has been true for over half a year at this point.

It is a very well known fact of polling right now.

Asking for a source at this point is more likely to be a bad faith attempt to throw doubt on a well known true thing then it is to be an actual request for information.

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Israel. Which is clear if you've read even one of their announcements of the blockade.

And calling the leadership of Yemen Houthis is like calling any US person a Kennedy.

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (22 children)

The enemy nation of shipping going to a nation committing genocide.

Ansarallah, like Hezbollah, has made it clear that their blockade stops with the genocide. (EDIT: to be clear, Hezbollah had said they'd stop their support front. They're not engaging in a blockade like Yemen.) When there was a ceasefire with prisoner exchange they both stopped. (Their respective actions.)

Leaving that bit out explicitly shows your bias.

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Supporting genocide is a pretty good black and white line.

Not recognizing it as such says everything about how important the lesson of 'never again' was to you.

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They've been doing the same for Hamas. Hospital administrator? Hamas. And so Israel bombs out their apartment killing them and their entire family. You know, back when there were apartments.

Same for police.

That one is what gives away Israels genocidal intent. Getting rid of police gets rid of the first line of defense against civil disorder, and the people most likely to do stuff like distribute food and supplies.

Police very rarely end up fighting as militantsin occupied countries, too. Unless you fire them en masse, which occupying countries shouldn't do, if they're smart.

Edit: We do know multiple EMT teams and doctors were hit by the beepers.

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Hezbollah is a government. Which has a large number of civilian members, including doctors that treat people.

Are the garbage collectors bad guys?

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Target large swathes of civilian populations is incredible targeting?

Only to those that think race/religion is what determines if someone is a legitimate target.

view more: ‹ prev next ›