CyberTerry

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] CyberTerry@leminal.space 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Same it's always been (at least since the civil war); profess social-democracy and national sovereignty as long as the ruling class has good private deals with uncle Sam, meanwhile all of the poor have their surplus labor extracted by gringos' enterprises and see their communities gentrified by their immigrants that self-proclaim as "expats" whatever that means. Damn gringos (and yes that includes Canadians as well).

[–] CyberTerry@leminal.space 4 points 6 days ago

That escalated quickly

[–] CyberTerry@leminal.space 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Lol should make one of the star of David as well

[–] CyberTerry@leminal.space 1 points 1 week ago

México --> La Sierra

[–] CyberTerry@leminal.space 4 points 1 week ago (16 children)

I mean it in Gramsci's terms. For the second question I would say the ones cited by OP are good examples but horizontal organization is my preferred one, look about EZLN ways of horizontal democracy. Again not saying they are the correct or morally good ones either.

[–] CyberTerry@leminal.space 7 points 1 week ago (19 children)

Elections≠Democracy. Again, you are expecting liberal west (or hegemonic) "democracy". I am not making a moral judgement of either, just trying to explain that the definition of democracy that has been shoved to the people's brain of the global north (hegemony) is not the only or the correct one.

[–] CyberTerry@leminal.space 8 points 1 week ago (23 children)

Cause you expect the west hegemonic definition of democratic.