DeckPacker

joined 1 week ago
[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

I guess gender is pretty much meaningless in my opinion. It probably should be abolished.

But also, it's fine if people care about their own gender.

It's not that big of a deal as people make it out to be.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Gender is a social construct and describes a certain way we choose to act and dress etc.

So it's pretty much impossible to be wrong about your gender if you are honest about your ambitions. The only way I could see someone being "wrong" about their gender is if someone says they are a certain gender but deliberately chooses to act in accordance with another. But even then, the line is blurry, so it would be stupid to police, what "true" gender expression is supposed to be.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That isn't even a real insult.

I think you need to get off the internet and go touch some grass or something.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And we should condemn them deeply for it.

You should still vote for them, I guess, but they don't even have a presidential candidate for the next election.

This purity testing between Democrats is so stupid. They fucking better give me a candidate, that doesn't want to slaughter Palestinians. That shouldn't be a controversial statement. If we signal to Democrats now, that we will vote for them no matter what stupid inhumane bullshit they do, then we are just gonna get another Biden that doesn't do anything for 4 years and then loose to the stupidest Republican candidate imaginable.

It's not like the Democrats do anything for transrights, Gavin Newsom literally said, that they were to supportive of Trans People and that's why they lost the last election. Shure, their own research (that they tried to hide from the public) showed, that Kamela Harris's position on Gaza lost them the election, but shure, let's blame the minority group that is already heavily under attack.

I mean, shure in the short term, Gavin Newsom might be preferable to Trump, but he will be so bad, that everybody is gonna hate him after 4 years and people will just return to the Republicans. If we just continue to accept the Democrats bullshit, we are not doing anything for ourselves.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Shut up, you are annoying

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It really depends on the video game I guess. There are a lot of video games, I would consider high art, but there are others, I wouldn't. That's really subjective though and other people will probably consider other games as art than me.

But there is no way to objectively determine what art is. My personal definition is like I determine the gender of a person. If the artist says, it's art, then it is art.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

It's still sold, so it definitely has a market value.

If you are talking about sociatal value, then I disagree even more firmly. Art has a lot of value, regardless of what medium it is delivered by.

You know that movies and video games are digital art, right?

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah, let's just take the Mona Lisa and shread it.

Can't be stealing if I don't make money from it, right?

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

In my life, why do I give valuable time to people who don't care if I live or die?

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Well, if you know that your comment is wrong, why not delete it?

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Anarchists are vehemently opposed to states such as the USSR and China. We consider them to be as great a danger as fascism.

Yes, apparently reading is hard

 

So currently, we have two different closed-off developer chats on Zulip and Matrix.
This means, that new devs will be confused about which channel to join and experienced devs have to actively look around in both channels for questions to answer.
This seems like a really inefficient system, so we should at least decide on one official communication channel.

The other issue with this is the closed-off nature of these real-time chat applications. Shure, anyone can join, but answers to technical questions will inevitably get burried in unstructured long chatlogs, which no new develloper will read through. That will lead to a lot of questions being asked, that were already answered previously.

If we abandoned these channels in favor of one unified piefed community (like piefed-devellopment@piefed.social) or something, we could build a good knowledge base of answered questions, that are easy to search through and look around in and will also get indexed by search engines. This will make it easier and easier for new developers to join over time, as they will be able to look through an increasingly extensive knowledge base if they have any questions and also easily find the people, that are willing to help them.

Funnily enough, Rimou has already talked about the advantages of a forum-like communication channel for open source devellopers, so i think it's time for us to apply this to our own project.

view more: next ›