That's worrying...
"you must follow legal orders" does not imply "you must refuse illegal orders"
Without a broader reading this section implies that obeying illegal orders is optional... which also implies it'll be on the service member to prove the order they disobeyed was illegal, at their court martial. Which puts a lot of pressure on them to do what they're told, they have to be really certain the order is illegal 🫤
Anyone taking bets on how long it'll be till RCMP officers are on the ground with assault rifles?
That's where these "meaningful consultations" increasingly end. At some point this will either lead to protest of any kind deemed illegal in these zones, or these zones being closed to the public and militarized 🫤
This absurdity about fire restrictions always bothers me.
I follow the rules and don't have a fire in the ultra safe, grade-A, sunk-into-a-gravel-pad, and surrounded by a 5m radius of gravel fire pit at a campground.
Meanwhile idiots like this ignore the warnings and do stupid and or criminal things anyways 🫤
But I know why Moe likes to talk about this, it deflects nicely from the "climate change exacerbated" image problem as he pushes for more oil and gas infrastructure.
Yes, yes, yes!
Considering they've been on the forefront of privatizing and dismantling said system for decades... 🤷
I'm curious, what is it you're "boo"ing? 🤔
I mean the house doing anything unanimously makes me think hell has frozen over, but tax cuts are everybody's farvorite policy.
Ticket to stay, once the camp has had an outbreak 🙄
It's either in place before the camp or there's no point.
Alberta: 119 years of making bad decisions, going on 120!
Too bad everything will be on fire up here 🫤
I guess it all hinges on which pipelines "make sense"; if none, I approve 🤷
Are they any better behaved?