FlyingSquid

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 
[–] FlyingSquid@mander.xyz 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They stopped the Persians...

[–] FlyingSquid@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

Stefan Milo always does terrific archaeology videos.

[–] FlyingSquid@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

No. Karaoke battle.

[–] FlyingSquid@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

What a fun site! Thanks! They discovered some wonderfully entertaining (and filthy) graffiti at Pompeii. https://www.thecollector.com/roman-graffiti-painting-pompeii-herculaneum/

[–] FlyingSquid@mander.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

Gotta do something with them...

[–] FlyingSquid@mander.xyz 5 points 2 years ago

If you read the study, they flat out said they dont know and have several hypothesis.

I have read the study. It says that it was either predation or scavenging and gives reasons why. It also explains why the mammal would be the one being the aggressor. It does not suggest in any place in that study what you suggested. This is what you said:

The simplest explanation was the mammal was on defense

Please show where the paper agrees with that supposed simplest explanation.

[–] FlyingSquid@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There was a study. Or did you ignore that?

It was even linked to in the article.

[–] FlyingSquid@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

That's not true at all. Wolves and lions constantly take on prey much bigger than them. And the dinosaur was an herbivore. Why would it be the aggressor?

I think I'll go with what the paleontologists who have had a chance to study the fossil have to say over someone who viewed a picture on the internet and came to their own conclusion that goes against the paleontologists.

[–] FlyingSquid@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Why is that the simplest explanation?

[–] FlyingSquid@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

I had this dream once of operating an early electric style studio. Not pre-electric like the first phonographs (one studio actually had a rope going into a well to spin the cylinder!) but all 1930s-era technology and recorded straight to disc. I think some musicians could really go for it. But I never did it.

Also, I am stunned that, within my lifetime, we have gone from being able to store 30 minutes of audio on one side of a vinyl disc, to over an hour on a CD to hundreds of hours on an MP3 player, to unlimited streaming almost anywhere in the world today.

 

On the drive north from Phnom Penh, I asked Gordon how he had learned about the looting of cultural heritage. ‘I went to the British Museum,’ he said drily

Erin Thompson in Cambodia on the trail of artifacts looted from temples during the genocide of the 1970s.

[–] FlyingSquid@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I always thought the Videodisk (and Phonovision for that matter) was such a cool idea. Use the same thing as what you're already using to record music. No need to reinvent the wheel. It's nice and efficient. Sadly, the former never caught on and the latter was just experimental.

[–] FlyingSquid@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

Examples of the script can be found at the original paper. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-968X.12269

view more: ‹ prev next ›