Fritee

joined 2 years ago
[–] Fritee@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In addition, a lot of the “natural talent” might be coming from early childhood practice when children's brains are the most malleable - eg if a kid is drawing since they are 6, it is much more likely they'll be noticed and cultivated. Which makes them more likely to appear talented when they are 11 / 15 etc, when they might be noticed and cultivated in turn etc. Early advantages pile up.

Not to say that some things gene related are not advantageous - you are not likely to become a basketball player if you are short, even if you put in enormous amounts of practice.

[–] Fritee@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Huh, that’s interesting. Do we know why the menarche age has receded?

[–] Fritee@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

To add, I think the batter capacity of a fairphone is 3905 mAh while eg Pixel 7 has 4355 so the diff is only ~10%

If I can replace a battery without throwing away the phone, I'd definitely be OK with 10% battery reduction

[–] Fritee@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

One thing to note is that if everyone stops having children, it will create a demographic crisis with a lot of older people / pensioners not able to work and not a lot of working age people to support the aging population. Good for environment ofc but quite bad for the remainder of population.

[–] Fritee@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Don't think private medicine companies are such a bad thing - there can only be so much research that is publicly funded and we can potentially miss out on some life saving drug not getting developed.

Imo a better solution would be decreasing the patent age so that the companies have only a small window to generate profit, after which the drugs would go into public domain. 20 years is way too long to profit of a discovery