Sure they are so well funded /s. At least they are able to speak their mind without getting banned.
Noted. You can go back to watching your favorite mainstream propaganda outlet.
Youtube bans North Korean vloggers, so much for "free speech".
So they blocked a channel of harmless snack-eating videos because the uploader is in NK? What am I missing?
He says something about the invincible comic having a white woman who was illustrated as a woman of color in the show and that people call that "woke".
The way they've simplified the game for the neurons, it still has a long way to go.
I tried in !video_feed@zerobytes.monster but the bot doesn't work because of a protection set on /signup and /login pages.
I can confirm that the Opera method works. I couldn't create an account before but I've managed to create the account using the built-in VPN of the Opera browser. Here's an example of a Python script written with Claude 2 that GPT-4 wouldn't have enough context for, https://lemm.ee/post/2595655 Really impressive.
Oh yeah I was thinking more along the lines of video games or movies where there are too many people creating it. For books, etc you can definitely donate.
There should be a way to pay only the workers when you buy something. In that case, you could pay them but only after pirating and making sure you enjoy it. Since there is nothing like that, I think you should pay only content from small creators. Big creators already have plenty, and paying for anything else just gives money to greedy executives who then lower the quality of the content to make more money. Of course, if you have the means and don't pay anything, you are just making sure there will be less of that content made in the future. It isn't scalable; if everybody pirated content without paying a single cent, there would be no content made except by hobbyists who don't want to make a living out of it.
I really like to see communities like lemmy.film, mtgzone.com, and programming.dev and wish there was an instance about literature.
July 24, 2014 news article
That's why he has more subscribers that the CNBC and other popular mainstream propaganda outlets, because he's untrustworthy /s 🤡
Let's focus on the substance of the information being presented rather than the person presenting it.