Hurvitz

joined 1 year ago
[–] Hurvitz@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

wish that were me

[–] Hurvitz@hexbear.net 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

My car will be above 100k miles soon, and I’ll likely have to get a new one in the next year or so.

Maybe it's just me but... no you won't? like what? I don't think I ever owned a car under 100k miles... Imagine being like "ope car's like 8 years old time to throw it out"

I guess old clunkers are the purview of poor people and amateur mechanics but still, absent a specific problem with the car this makes no sense.

[–] Hurvitz@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The gentrification of the mind mention cat-vibing

[–] Hurvitz@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

heavily situation dependent. Autonomous region of what state, at what time, in what political context? It isn't something with a strict definition across time and space

[–] Hurvitz@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't see why degradation of the individual physical floppies is a concern, since they can be imaged and written onto new(er) floppies, or the system retrofitted to read the same data from a different medium, but I can see where a more modern system would provide a lot of advantages. It doesn't really sound like anyone in this article knows the nitty gritty details that well, though the bit about the loop cable is good.

The SFMTA is looking to upgrade to "modern technologies, such as fiber optic or Wi-Fi," Roccaforte said.

PLEASE do not use wifi to run your trains lmao

[–] Hurvitz@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where are the goldfish-brained dipshits who always come out of the woodwork to call you a conspiracy theorist and say "yeah we did regime change in the past but not now"?

[–] Hurvitz@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

tracking link btw

[–] Hurvitz@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Objection to the use of my personal checkout history may seem like a small thing, but it essentializes how oppressive political regimes oppress. I had a friend who lived in the former Soviet Union who explained to me that the most private thing about you is what you read

internet-delenda-est

I mean sure, I don't want to be spied on for profit. But jfc she just haaaaad to sneak a jab at the USSR in there. It's like its contractual for these people, any criticism of US capitalism has to include an "imagine how much worse it would be in bad country" segment

[–] Hurvitz@hexbear.net 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I don't think this is actually a school. China-knowers feel free to correct me, but it seems like a public market or cafeteria with facial recognition for payment (probably through alipay or one of the other big players)

Here's a little background on facial recognition payment systems in China: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/08/china-releases-plans-to-restrict-facial-recognition-technology.html

They seem to have sprung up and become popular quickly, spread to other sectors (like apartment entry), and now the government is setting some limits on their use to serve the public good:

The draft did not specify the law’s requirements, but said businesses should not require people to use facial recognition to receive better services.

Building management cannot use facial recognition as the only way for people to enter or exit, the draft said, noting if individuals don’t agree to facial recognition, management should provide other “reasonable and convenient” methods.

[–] Hurvitz@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is this actually a school, though? the propagandist posting this didn't bother to check certainly (edit: and didn't even claim it specifically). It doesn't really look like one to me, and facial recognition would make a lot more sense as payment, not as school ID.

[–] Hurvitz@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

soon to be more embarassing

[–] Hurvitz@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does it bug anyone else when they say "World's richest billionaires"? Like yeah no shit captain redundancy, there's a word for them though, it's "people". They're just people. This billionaire identity building/mythmaking language has got to stop. Plus its just a way to not normalize gender neutral language/a drop in replacement for "world's richest men" that is technically gender neutral but carries an implication...

view more: next ›