KEI

joined 1 week ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] KEI@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 hours ago

it's up to you

[–] KEI@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 hours ago

That’s a nice thing to say. Thank you for speaking clearly and properly. Judging a link as suspicious is your own will, and trusting and reading it is also your own will. Communication is interaction, not one side’s will, right?

The things I hear should be good. What I spit out is good too.

[–] KEI@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

just think about your intelligence again

[–] KEI@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 hours ago (4 children)
[–] KEI@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 days ago

You're wrong again. Neither you nor I have the authority to diagnose. Moreover, you already made the diagnosis even though you had no authority. What you chose is not communication with others, but blame through assertion—that is it.

I'm just someone chasing the cause of the social phenomenon you're talking about, and you have blamed me exactly as you wanted.

[–] KEI@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Your predication is neat. If you have been reading my writing carefully, you should ask me a question. But you only made a predication without asking any question.

But I am, I read your comment and I asked what effect you mentioned. Of course, I can make an inference, but I cannot be sure whether what I inferred is your will or if it is perfectly correct. And so, I asked and asked via negative sentences. Because your comment was negative sentences. In other words, I am looking for evidence from you, and you did not and making predication. This is very important thing for Diagnosis and Symptoms of psychosis and the difference between you and me.

[–] KEI@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (4 children)

And so, are you a person with that kind of result?

[–] KEI@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Hey! so, are you the result?

[–] KEI@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

As you said, using technology to harm a person’s mind is an attack. One way to defend this is also resistance.

It is not contagious like a disease. And gaslighting one person is only possible through interaction. LLMs also cannot gaslight someone if there is no interaction.

What I referred to as a psychological vulnerability is that gaslighting exploits the other person’s bias. This bias is something that a person with bias created for themselves.

My bias is that I cannot accept contradiction, it does not make logical sense, and resisting everything that is not real fact.

You’re basically saying that I can be gaslighted by LLMs without even realizing it. So, I am saying don't worry about that, I am stronger than others.

[–] KEI@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 days ago

Crushing of a cage aquaculture farm

[–] KEI@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Thank you.

Human mental immunity exists. I will mention examples for two social fields.

Using human psychological vulnerability for economic, industrial, or human purposes is “advertising.” Some people go along with advertising, but others feel uncomfortable with exposure.

Politically, let me give an example from Korea. There is a word in Korea called "Gukppong." There is a tendency for the government and the media to excessively promote achievements and distort the truth. Because this distortion is said to have the effect of being drug-fueled, a new term was coined in Korea: “Nation + drugs = Gukppong.” There are an enormous number of people in Korea who are immune to Gukbbong.

[–] KEI@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What nonsense are you talking about again.

Robber did try to kill with a knife. But the victim ran away or avoided it. Then what kind of punishment does the robber get, and the victim is no longer the victim?

I think you should see a specialist at the hospital as soon as possible. Don't ride the time machine.

view more: next ›