KevinFRK

joined 2 years ago
[–] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The photo with the dead tree in the water is really satisfying - well done. A large print and put up on (a shaded) wall sort of thing.

The other photo, of the far side of a lake, doesn't really work for me - there's the tree lines and their reflections pointing to the centre, but there's nothing there to look at. You needed someone waving, or a large treasure chest (X marks the spot) or something.

[–] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Mmm, I really must learn to crank up the speed on a sunny day. I don't normally go above 1/1250.

[–] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

It's not cheating, it's taking advantage of your observations to date!

And that's a delightfully crisp photo - what speed was your camera set at?

[–] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Mmm, yes, you'd rather expect a path for the eye to start at the edge and move to the focus.

[–] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Yes, that again works, but needed that log.

Out of interest, did you also take a shot while in front of that patch of herbs? It could be taken as obscuring things, rather than deliberately breaking up the man-made parts (which is what I guess you intended).

[–] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Mmm, lens hoods are vital lens protectors - I'm not sure mine have ever usefully stopped glare, but protecting from knocks - invaluable!

[–] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

For all depth of focus is more with a telephoto lens, I'd guess that's still the cause of the issue. I'm just delighted the bulk worked so crisply, I'll forgive the camera/physics a few hairs :)

[–] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yes, depth of focus is greater, removing one issue of macro photography (at least, unless you've the hang of focus stacking and the post-processing required).

[–] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Well, yes, I suppose there's that...

[–] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Cat making itself comfortable in an entirely inappropriate place (loft?) checks out.

 

Now this ought to have been taken with my 100mm Macro Lens, but all I had was Canon R5 Mk II + RF200mm-800mm lens, with a minimum focal distance of 0.8m at 200mm.

But I get the terrible feeling it was better done with the telephoto lens !?!

Anyway, what might be a female "Beautiful Demoiselle" (but could be some other sort of Damselfly), nowhere near water.

[–] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

As far as I'm concerned, post away, daily, or even (a little!) more frequently.

As to the photo - it obviously meets your stated goal, but the sun coming through the trees and providing some shadow boundaries, to me, is an important lift to the picture. It suggests to me that, while sticking to your goal, always look for an additional lift, without it needing to be consistent across the set.

[–] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Sun, sea and sand ... and cloud !?!

A potent combination - I've had unexpectedly pleasing photos along the same lines

 

Coming in to land, Prospect Park, Reading, UK

I just find them so satisfying to photo on the days my camera is in sync with my idea of what to focus on.

Canon R5 Mk II + RF200-800mm

 

A warbler, anyway.

Reading, UK. Canon R5 MkII + RF200-800mm lens - foolishly at 1/500s (far too slow for birding with that lens, but got away with it).

 

Because we all need more spider, and I was taking my Canon RF100mm macro lens for its first spin of the year.

And no, I haven't got into on-the-fly (hah!) aperture correction, or focus stacking, but I quite liked having the plane of the web being the level of best focus.

 

... Have a variety pack from my walk along the Kennet Canal from Southcote Lock to central Reading, UK. Canon R5 Mk II + RF200-800mm lens

Whitethroat (?); Sedge Warbler (?); Robin (and why not!); Gray Wagtail; Cormorant; Grey Heron Mallard; And two more Grey Wagtails

Grey wagtails are obviously called grey becuase of all the yellow in their colouring, or something. It was a really bad day to be an insect along the canal - these were only some of the wagtails depleting their numbers!

 

Some bird names are easy to give :)

Prospect Park, Berks, UK Canon R5 Mk II + RF200-800mm lens

And a bonus head on shot:

 

Taken yesterday in Prospect Park, Reading, UK - I quite like it for all I'd accidentally knocked it to F13 from the F9 it should have been

Canon R5 MkII + RF200-800mm

 

Around the Southcote Meadows and Kennet Canal, to the SW of Reading, UK.

Feral Parakeet (there was at least four of them); Grey Heron; Wren

Common Jay; Cormorant; Two Gadwalls, I think

Another Gadwall; Coot surfacing and Roe Deer

I've neither seen Parakeets (possibly Rose-ringed) or Gadwalls before, at least not to photo in the wild, and on the Gadwalls I'm open to correction.

OK, so a Roe Dee is not a bird, so this pack is wildly off-topic - sorry!

Canon R5 MkII + RF200-800mm lens

 

Yes, yes, you shouldn't read emotion into bird poses, but...

Reading, UK

Canon R5 Mk II + RF200-800mm

 

Just because I adore the subtle beauty of the female.

Reading, UK

Canon R5 Mk II RF200-800mm

I had to halve the pixel width to get Lemmy to accept the photo: 8192 x 5464 is too many pixels the app tells me, regardless of if I hammer the quality to get the file size down below 2 Mb. When the error message "Too many pixels" pops up, it really means it!

 

Since no other photos of it have been posted here yet ... Partial Solar Eclipse, 11am, Reading, UK

Canon R5 Mk II + RF600mm F11 + Thousand Oaks Optical Solar Filter (alas filter missing any details of its "strength") all on a Manfrotto 405 tripod.

Bottom left is the original (ISO500, 1/125s, F11) , top left is playing around with the histogram tool to emphasise brightness changes, top right a slightly later photo again with histogram modification.

 

Starling, nest building (while their partner seemed to be stuffing themselves with food a couple of yards away!)

Prospect Park, Reading, UK

Canon R5 Mk II + RF200-800mm lens

view more: next ›