Sharing, because I had to look up Abstract Wikipedia
Abstract Wikipedia is an in-development project of the Wikimedia Foundation. It aims to use Wikifunctions to create a language-independent version of Wikipedia using its structured data.
Sharing, because I had to look up Abstract Wikipedia
Abstract Wikipedia is an in-development project of the Wikimedia Foundation. It aims to use Wikifunctions to create a language-independent version of Wikipedia using its structured data.
Microsoft actually cut off Israel’s access to Azure…
After months of pressure and trying to silence internal criticism.
I had to look it up to make sure "months of" is correct. Wikipedia has the infos https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Microsoft#Israeli_military_support 2023-2025, various employees fired
“Microsoft actually cut off Israel’s access to Azure” doesn't really cover or adequately represent their behavior regarding this topic.
That comment doesn't say anything about what I'm asking about here.
IMO the intro “[shared] to the respective secret scanning partner” is a bit misleading because it can be read as third parties unrelated to the secret that do secret scanning. The text later on only mentions the issuer of secrets, though.
To protect the developer community, GitHub partners with hundreds of secret scanning partners to identify leaked secrets.
GitHub works directly with industry partners like AWS, OpenAI, and Stripe to build detectors for their specific secret formats […]
GitHub notifies the secret issuer when publicly leaked secrets are found, allowing the partner to take immediate action.
Probably in some AI training data sets. Not that those are particularly good backups.
maybe they also mean Israel/Gaza or the AI push
… Gitlab though; the only difference is you see more “a large premium customer is requesting this” comments!
I love those! /s 😄 It can certainly feel like a pattern, specifically for some tickets.
I expect some hot Java code on that website 😏
YouTube recently introduced UI changes. Google probably didn't optimize for Firefox besides Chrome. Whatever they're doing, it may be more performance on Chrome than on Firefox for technical reasons.
As a quality metric, "bad company". If you can differentiate between hardware product and drivers, you can separate those metrics. But usually, and for most people, using the product also means using their drivers.
You can just take the L and say you didn’t see that the function definition that was “added” was just “removed” at the top.
That's not what happened though.
Changing the indent of the def changes the definition. That's my whole argument.
I don't get why you say "of course", agreeing with my point, but then "it was only the indentation that was changed".
linked src