KombatWombat

joined 2 years ago
[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 1 points 54 minutes ago

Next Mr. Beast video is going to be crazy

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

It's not racist. People accuse others of that term too flippantly. It is ignorant though.

Language changes a great deal over time, and slurs are no exception. What is a completely inoffensive label at some point can be a slur later on. What is a mild insult in one area can be much more severe somewhere else. Sometimes what was a slur can be reclaimed and become acceptable, even positive. But that can also depend on who is saying it and other contextual details. I don't know anything about "k!wifarms" but I wouldn't assume malicious intent without more information.

That example looks much like the No True Scotsman fallacy, since a word is redefined later to exclude what would be exceptions to their claim based on an added qualification. Person A also made Person B get the evidence to refute their claim rather than fulfilling the burden of proof themselves. I know it's not a formal debate or anything, but even so, bad faith arguments are just rude. Just own the mistake and say "you're right, I was only thinking of first world countries/liberal democracies/developed nations/whatever".

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

ITT: arguments about the Ship of Theseus

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

It needs to be said because someone thinks it doesn't need to be said? That doesn't make sense.

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Well that's kind of the point. It's low hanging fruit because everyone agrees with it. No one thinks you are obligated to argue with others, which is the straw man's position. It's not that you don't have a right to block critics, the question is "When is it a good idea?".

It sounds like a lot of people think the author does it too liberally, which can lead to an echo chamber. Most people would say creating a lawsuit against your critics is also an overreaction, but people have also been saying she gets harassed a lot. That makes it more reasonable if true.

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Droll means amusing. You might have meant dull instead

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I'm sorry, I can't understand what you are saying.

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If everyone quit tipping at once, yes, that would mean immediate, dramatic change. But that is unrealistic. And some people not tipping in protest when it is expected while most continue the tradition is the worst outcome for the workers. It makes their material conditions worse but not to the point of achieving anything.

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I don't disagree with anything you said. But being a cheapskate is rude and will not solve the problem.

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Congratulations, that's really impressive!

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I used to use libby but the popular books at my library had months long waiting times so I just pirate now. It means I can read on my own time. Plus, I can get the audiobook versions and work/drive/shop/whatever while "reading". It's a game changer.

view more: next ›