Lifter

joined 2 years ago
[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 hours ago

It's really easy. I use SKLauncher and a dedicated server. You need to disable some player verification setting on the server but that's it.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago

They are not the same, but 0 can be implicitly converted to false.

What do you get if you do: 0 === false

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago

I agree. If anything it should check if there is a nuumber and 0 is clearly a number.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 3 days ago

No but then the argument above falls flat, doesn't it?

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You are obviously not interested in listening to a word I'm saying. Goodbye.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago

Perro salsiccia!

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago

Sticky cooks

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Alternatively, we need to stop saying E2EE is safe at all, for any type of data, because or the arbitrary usage.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 4 days ago (5 children)

You probably didn't understand me. I'm saying that a company can just arbitrarily decide (like you did) that the server is the "end" recipient (which I disagree with). That can be done for chat messages too.

You send the message "E2EE" to the server, to be stored there (like a file, unencrypted), so that the recipient(s) can - sometime in the future - fetch the message, which would be encrypted again, only during transport. This fully fits your definition for the cloud storage example.

By changing the recipient "end", we can arbitrarily decode the message then.

I would argue that the cloud provider is not the recipient of files uploaded there. In the same way a chat message meant for someone else is not meant for the server to read, even if it happens to be stored there.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Uhh yes, sorry. I had it the other way around. Perhaps a native american then raped/had child with a caucasian, who kept the child?

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 days ago (7 children)

The third paragraph contradicts your other point. You define E2EE in two wildly different ways.

The chat messages are most likely stored on an intermediary server, which would qualify for the same loophole you pointed out in the cloud storage example.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago (3 children)

No, the other ancestors are all native American. Obviously the child stayed in the native to community.

 

Maybe this is why pi was chosen for half of the circumference of a circle.

view more: next ›