Correlation is not causation
There could be a 3rd driving force that's causing both trends, among other possible explanations
Lightfire228
joined 2 years ago
Fair phone 6 running /e/OS is honestly amazing
Completely degoogled ROM, using MicroG to emulate google play services
Depends on how much i take. If i take a full 15mg edible, I'm gonna be toasted and unable to keep a steady train of thought
If i take half, i actually find it far easier to get into hyperfocus
I vaguely remember from Japanese class that China's name means "middle country"
But i dunno about that "go" character specifically. It might have a different meaning in this context?
The yeast of thoughts and mind
globglogabgalab
UwUpsie daisy
FTFY
They can use speed to filter for walking / biking as well as if their path stays on the road
Not perfect, but a really good guestimate
Yes, actually
A combination of better dyes that don't bleed as much, and detergent that works better in colder water (which bleeds less dyes).
This makes me curious how effective that would actually be
It probably depends on the electrical conductivity of WD 40, and whether it corrodes
When I'm doing mental roll call (to make sure I've not trapped one somewhere), i call them
- cat 1
- cat 2
- dog 1
- cat 3
- dog 2
In order of their acquisition
I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case
but a correlation (as presented in the first comment) is not a valid explanation (again, as is presented in the comment)