LoafyLemon

joined 2 years ago
[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 29 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I was standing up for this guy recently, arguing that having a donation page is fine. However, this goes way beyond donations and feels more like a sale.

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you want something similar, without ads, no snaps, LTS, but with periodic kernel updates, then Pop!_OS might be up your alley.

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Asking the real question.

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

'Many of you may die, but it is the sacrifice I'm willing to make.'

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You are the second person I've met that understands the difference between AI and AGI. It might not mean much to you, but it means a lot to me. I found my people!

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I'm ready to draw my pen out. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

XP-PEN Deco Mini 7, works out of the box with the generic kernel driver as well. Posting in case someone's looking for one.

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I employ VPN, TOR, and additionally, I manage sites utilizing CloudFlare. I can tell you this much: There aren't many alternative services that safeguard your website and gather statistics while respecting the privacy of the end user. CloudFlare even provides onion routes for TOR users, which I've naturally activated for my website. Thus, the issue doesn't rest with CloudFlare; it's a tool. The true issue lies with the webmasters abusing their power and using overzealous rulesets.

They could easily apply the same rulesets by utilizing nginx to proxy the traffic and implementing blocks on their side, avoiding CloudFlare altogether. The only distinction would be the increased expenses and a different host, nothing more.

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Centralization is an issue, but it's not Cloudflare to blame, it's the ISPs and governing bodies. Consider this: who's the one who initiated the initial block in the first place?

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 43 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

I don't see the need to vilify Cloudflare. So far, they have shown nothing but respect towards net neutrality, fighting against bad internet practices (like Google), and even standing up to ISPs and governments to protect their users, whether they're pirates or not.

They have been around long enough (10+ years) to let you judge them and their services through their actions, not rumours.

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 100 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

It's in the first paragraph.

In 2022, rightsholders obtained permission in Austria to block several pirate site domains and a list of IP addresses that actually belonged to Cloudflare. ISPs had no choice but to comply with the court's instructions which took out countless Cloudflare customers in Austria. According to reviews conducted by local telecoms regulator TKK, the IP address blocking violated net neutrality regulations and will no longer be allowed.

In other words, only domain blocking will be allowed, IP blocking will not be permitted, and cloudflare IPs must be unblocked again.

view more: ‹ prev next ›