Luci

joined 2 years ago
[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel like if you’re at that point you’re developing your own kernel (just a hobby project, won’t be anything big)

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

I wouldn’t want to be 153

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 127 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Linux From Scratch

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Twitter comments are absolutely nuts

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Way too real

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 month ago

Who the bestest boy/girl is.

To a dog, of course.

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m okay with them using MIT licensed code, without it the Windows NT network stack would be garbage, juniper switches wouldn’t have changes networking, the ps3 and Nintendo switch would have never happened they way they did

Should they (MS and Apple) been better and more open about it? Sure! But we also benefited by it in a sense. I’ll take the bad with the good here

(Not trying to tell you that you’re wrong ftr)

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That’s fair, but what did you mean by this part:

American technology corporations have proven themselves to be a negative for society (even if most Americans would considering such thinking Haram).

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

They never have a bottle that says Luci :((((

Edit: did I get a down vote because Coke hates my name? Good lord!

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

I love this stuff, I’m gonna stick with MIT for myself but I love that there are so many options.

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

If I understand LGPL correctly, any change would require the modified code to be open sourced and available, where as with MIT the developer is free to modify the code without requiring publishing it?

I want people to use my code in their games so they can get an idea to code faster, I feel like LGPL would be a limiting factor imo

view more: ‹ prev next ›