Magiccupcake

joined 2 years ago

Parking lots waste a lot of area that could be green space too.

But yes overdevelpment could be a problem , but is easily fixed by adding a green space rule to development. Like we have now for minimum parking and such.

Also high speed roads destroy a lot of green space too, with nothing in the median or a good chunk on either side, and huge empty areas in dead zones of interchanges.

Lets not think cuurent car use is good for green space.

[–] Magiccupcake@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm not disagreeing with that, but high speed rail from Boston to Miami would be extremely practical. Efficient, fast, convient travel along that corridor reducing dependence on cars for city to city travel. And the area has both the demand and density to support such projects.

And while its impractical now, if it was built to cheapen regional travel in the region it could grow to high use spurning economic development.

I'd love to take a train at a reasonable pace from near to DC to my family in Pittsburgh, or to visit New York.

I might even enjoy a cross country trek to the rockies for skiing on a train, but it's never going to be an option.

[–] Magiccupcake@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

East coast united states has similar population density to most of europe.

It's just out west we have a lot of empty land.

He talks about the intersection a lot, but the main problem with this intersection has nothing to do with the intersection itself. It's the surrounding area that backs up into and causes it to fail.

Driving requires courtesy and attention, but overreliance on cars make people the opposite.

People get frustrated driving in traffic, causing them to be rude and agressive.

Meanwhile if driving is the only way to get around, even for easily distracted people or busy or whatever, they are not going to pay proper attention. Safety features like blind spot detection and automatic crash avoidance just make people pay even less attention.

You say the problem isn't cars, but it is because in america cars are the only way to get around for most trips.

If you make other options more conpelling or faster, than these problems are less severe for those left on the road.

[–] Magiccupcake@startrek.website 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can always count on people to be irresponsible, selfish, and reckless. So yeah its bad road design to count on people to be safe, when they just aren't.

[–] Magiccupcake@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Citron ami goes for arond 8k in Europe, but I'm sure someone could find cheaper used.

And yeah taxes, fuel, and maintenance are more, but most consumers badly underestimate those costs.

Calling light electric seems redundant. Its like saying electric electromangantic radiation.

Drivers don't t have to look left on right in green, so should naturally look in the direction they're going, and thus see pedestrians and cyclists.

They also have time to spot them while waiting.

[–] Magiccupcake@startrek.website 11 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I like that cargo bike but damn 6k? That's close to cheap car territory.

Maybe if we didn't build our cities and communities so hostile to humans, this wouldn't be as much as a problem.

view more: ‹ prev next ›