Malossi167

joined 2 years ago
[–] Malossi167@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

but I am planning on making it external with adapters and what not!

Make sure that the adapter you get supports optical drives and has an external 12V PSU.

I use an LG BH16NS55 myself. My best drive.

If it is just for this you can use pretty much any drive just make sure it supports Bluray XL although any on the market right now should do so.

Unless I am mistaken any Bluray birner can burn MDisk Blurays just fine. Unlike M Disk DVDs they do not need a special laser.

[–] Malossi167@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

First of all I have to drop a sanity check on you: do you NEED to buy a dedicated server to host one low traffic website?!?!

If anything I would avoid running my own public webserver at all. I gladly pay a hoster a few bucks a year or month to take care of this.

[–] Malossi167@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

exFAT solves the cross compatibility issue by removing most features other modern file system have. Fine for some users but not necessarily something I would recommend to someone with a drive array.

On top of that those USB RAID enclosures kinda suck. Unreliable, minimal status info and rebuilds tend to be tricky at best. You should not use them unless you are forced to.

A NAS is likely a much better option and they do not cost that much extra compared to a ~4bay RAID DAS.

[–] Malossi167@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Best" is usually a vague term. Best would be likely a high end enterprise SSD. Costs about as much as a car but is reliable and pumps out data at multi GB/s speed all day long.

How much storage do you need?

How big is your budget?

How fast does it have to be?

How large are your games usually?

[–] Malossi167@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

One of the strong suits of USB is the downward compatibility. So it should work. But check the description of your enclosure.

You can run a 990 Pro without a heatsink but be prepared for thermal throttling when you use the drive a bit more. TBH getting a 4.0 case is kinda pointless without a heatsink

[–] Malossi167@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Option 1 does work but laptops are not ideal as a server. They lack the IO and have tiny heatsinks that tend to get clogged with dust. And those USB DAS are kinda expensive. And USB is less reliable than SATA although it usually works well enough for something non critical like a media server.

Option 2 is kinda bad as this NAS is too low end to run Plex. You need something with an Intel CPU.

You can get a used desktop PC for $1-200 that has a 6th Gen Intel 4 core CPU or newer and is able to house 4 drives or more. Only needs a bit more of power than option 1 or 2 but is cheap and works rather well as a NAS and server.

[–] Malossi167@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Automating and streaming backups is definitely the way to go. Otherwise, it is really likely your backups are outdated and/or incomplete.

Please add the capacity of your drives. Upgrading to fewer, high capacity drives can be well worth it.

[–] Malossi167@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Build a NAS with 100TB and then start downloading. 90TB should take about 10 bays to download with a 1Gbit line. Although your ISP might get mad.

[–] Malossi167@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Backups and even accessing files can be a bit of a pain with two OS. NTFS drivers for Linux are a thing and they mostly work but I would not overly rely on it. For this reason, I would consider using a NAS for storing and accessing your files. It can also handle your backups with Rclone.

[–] Malossi167@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Data recovery is not really something you should DIY unless you are fine with losing the data. Chances are high you will make professional recovery more expensive or outright impossible by tinkering yourself.

Your best bet is to make a disk image. For this the HDD will be read like a vinyl record from beginning to end. For a file copy the read head usually has to seek around a lot to read all the file (fragments) bit by bit.

[–] Malossi167@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

10TB for €120? Are these used drives?

I would strongly consider bigger drives. 18TB or more. Using small drives is expensive in the long run. More W per TB, more bays per TB, need for bigger and more expensive cases, need for HBAs and maybe some high end platform to get enough PCIe lanes etc.

[–] Malossi167@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

i5 processor

What i5? If it has an iGPU you most likely should remove the 970. Will just needless eat power and PCIe lanes in this setup.

setup both hard drives as a raid 1

You mean RAIDz1?

I would consider something else than TrueNAS and ZFS as a home user. It is a robust OS and file system but usually not the best option for most small home setups. mergerFS+Snapraid or Unraid are far more flexible as they allow you to add single drives of any size down the line. The performance and reliability are usually good enough for a home user with a 1, or 2.5Gbe network.

Once your system is setup tinker a bit with the OS, setup some file shares and once you know how to set up everything properly copy your stuff over and verify afterward if it was done correctly. Not really a big deal.

view more: ‹ prev next ›