Muehe

joined 2 years ago
[–] Muehe@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'll have you know that this is famous sci-fi author Charles David George Stross posting an excerpt from his seminal novel Don't Create The Torment Nexus. The warning is right in the title, I'm sure nobody will be dumb enough to ignore it!

[–] Muehe@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

[...] a public institution is really not a great example of the general population [...]

Which I touched upon in my disclaimer, but in some ways it is a great example. Public institutions are defined by the general population, indirectly through their representatives creating the rules that govern them, and directly through contact with the public at large. Now if all our institutions still use this very outdated technology, and you can have trouble convincing them - during a global pandemic mind you - that using email is just as safe as using fax (so not safe at all basically), then that speaks to a larger mindset in the general population.

Many in the general public are also a lot quicker, some might even say careless, with adopting new technology of course. But as a society we are rather slow, and there are surprisingly many individuals who are hesitant or entirely resistant to adopting new technology. The fediverse usage is a bubble in a bubble here.

The internet infrastructure is another good example for this on the societal level, as there were plans in the 1980ies [!] to lay out a glass fibre network between every publicly used building in the country, which would have gotten us a good part of the way towards adopting this new material at scale. But in the end it was deemed unnecessary and too expensive and the project got canned (mixed in with rumours of "close friendship" between the chancellor and a major copper producer). Instead now we have people running around thirty years later and collecting signatures at the door for last-mile fibre network projects that seldom make quorum and thus almost never materialise public funding.

[–] Muehe@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  1. [...] But also how are Germans technologically behind regarding common personal life?

I bet you wherever in Germany you are, if you go to the website of your local city government right now they will have a still active fax number in their contact information. I guarantee it. Well if they have a website that is.

Which is a bit silly as an example but highlights the central problem, which is that adoption of new technology happens at a glacial pace, especially in public institutions. There are many reasons for that of course, some good, like the aforementioned inclination towards privacy, some bad like whatever allows fax machines to still be around.

And don't get me started on internet infrastructure... In an international comparison we certainly aren't leading the field regarding adoption of new technologies.

[–] Muehe@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
  1. Wait for lunar eclipse to start
  2. Name the seer king
  3. Wait for totality
  4. Do a little regicide
[–] Muehe@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

Depends on the kind of colour blindness you have I guess. I think I have the congenital red-green blindness common among men, and saturate Just Works™ for me. Plus I don't have to fiddle with setting a rotation degree there.

[–] Muehe@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, can't use the same IP range as your LAN, that will lead to problems. :D Glad it's fixed.

Out of curiosity, does forwarding work now without the output (-o) command in PostUp?

[–] Muehe@lemmy.ml 117 points 10 months ago (7 children)

PSA for my fellow colour blind people, you can use inspect element option of your browser to add a filter: saturate(100); rule to the element for this kind of image:

[–] Muehe@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Like I said in another thread on this post, I'm pretty sure that's because they are forwarding input but not output in the PostUp rules. Setting a /32 in AllowedIPs works fine for me.

[–] Muehe@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (7 children)

What are you trying to say? That reply also shows AllowedIPs set to a /32 on the server side.

[–] Muehe@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (9 children)

I don't think that's what the setting does. Anyway, I have them set to a /32 IP in my server config and it works nonetheless. I get full access to the /24 behind the server from the client.

[–] Muehe@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (11 children)

You have ALL traffic being routed over Wireguard here.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it the other way around? All Wireguard traffic is forwarded to the local interface.

[–] Muehe@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

I think the problem might be your PostUp/PostDown lines have an in-interface (-i) but are missing an out-interface (-o) for the forwarding. Try this:

PostUp   = iptables -A FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -A FORWARD -o %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ens3 -j MASQUERADE
PostDown = iptables -D FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -D FORWARD -o %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -o ens3 -j MASQUERADE
view more: ‹ prev next ›