Those things being evil does not make cluster bombs less evil.
It is fascinating how personal biases shape our communications and beliefs.
...in your opinion. As per your link, the IAEA does not share your certainty.
Grossi asserted that he "didn't see that kind of development" on the ground, but also that "anything can happen, that is what worries me".
IAEA is not confirming it, but I think it's a stretch to get "pure deranged nonsense" from that quote.
If it becomes a problem then sure.
/r/UnresolvedMysteries had a lot of rules because it was a big sub and needed to maintain the quality of its content. This is a very small, very new community so I'm inclined to let "anything go" (within reason) for now and the more restrictive rules can come if and when the community grows.
I would say at this point you can post whatever you like, as long as it's on-topic and is intended to inspire a discussion. There's so little content here that there's no point in restricting what you can post.
Don't let facts get in the way of partisan rage
Yes, I see that as the most likely outcome unfortunately.
I don't see it as a bad thing if the right-wing vote splits between the Tories and a new party.
Whenever Reddit execs have made the news over the past decade or so, the clear impression I've had is that they are just a bunch of immature highschoolers who are in way over their depth.
RiF has also confirmed it'll shut down on 30th June too
view more: next ›
I disagree. The trouble with cluster bombs (as with landmines) is that they are indiscriminate killers. Sure, they may kill some Russian soldiers now, but the ones that don't explode (a huge minority of them) will remain in the ground until an innocent Ukrainian child gets blown up years from now.
It's fine to cheer on the 'killing Russian soldiers' part, but when it comes to cluster bombs that comes hand in hand with 'killing innocent civilians, years after the conflict ends', which is less okay.