Natanael

joined 8 months ago
[–] Natanael 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is like when Xerox sometimes copied numbers wrong because their error correction algorithms were flawed

[–] Natanael 6 points 1 month ago

Simply not caring and letting the dice roll machine drive

[–] Natanael 3 points 1 month ago

Sure, but that gives end users standing to sue, not these guys

[–] Natanael 1 points 1 month ago

5G with MU-MIMO and beam forming makes the job easier for the cellphone modem to pick up the signal. Especially in crowds

[–] Natanael 3 points 1 month ago

IDF literally don't even bother to verify if the people they're shooting at or bombing is a hostage.

[–] Natanael 1 points 1 month ago

US used to call it FAANG (but then there's been a bunch of renames)

[–] Natanael 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But ad blockers don't distribute derivative materials.

It's like saying you can't distribute a stencil to cover up things you don't like to see in a book.

[–] Natanael 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Ad blockers do literally the reverse, they don't inject anything, they sit on the outside and prevent unwanted resources from loading.

Also it's fully legal for the end user to modify stuff on their own end. And the information in the filter about the website structure is functional, not expressive - no copyright protection of function.

To claim copyright infringement for not rendering a website as intended due to filters also means it would be infringement to not render the website correctly for any other reason - such as opening the website with an unsupported browser, or on hardware with limited support, or with a browser with limited capabilities - or why not because you're using accessibility software!

[–] Natanael 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Even that shouldn't be illegal. It's shitty, but it's still too far

[–] Natanael 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ah, yes, "it's taken this dude longer than this other dude to pay off his debt, surely we want to give him MORE credit"

[–] Natanael 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

You're no longer proving continously that you can keep paying reliably (yes it's dumbass logic)

[–] Natanael 3 points 1 month ago

While we're sleeping different parts of our brain is essentially idle and unresponsive. During the dream phase (REM sleep) there's still multiple parts that are unresponsive even as the dreaming part is active. And everything we do that's almost fully handled by a certain part of our brain won't work in dreams when that part is idling.

The things that works but acts weird in our dreams is partially controlled by an idling part of our brain, but our dreaming part of the brain has a separate redundant model of that thing, but it isn't complete (see: complex movement, etc)

view more: ‹ prev next ›