That's not quite sufficient. Look at a bit more advanced cryptographic stuff like Snarkblock.
You still got the issue that blocks WILL have a publicly visible effect when you block somebody who already have replied to you.
That's not quite sufficient. Look at a bit more advanced cryptographic stuff like Snarkblock.
You still got the issue that blocks WILL have a publicly visible effect when you block somebody who already have replied to you.
From a technical standpoint, doing it in another way requires your blocks to be public.
He and you are both publishing individual comments with metadata telling which thread and where in it that these entries go. The instance hosting the community simply pull all these entries together. To cut off that response then your instance must tell that hosting instance to detach that reply from the blocked user. Currently Lemmy doesn't support any such thing.
These TVs coexisted with abbreviated texting in Sweden
Well excuse me for being from the Nordics where it was adopted early
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS
1993 feels VERY 90's to me for some reason.
Also I distinctly remember Nokia phones even before the 3310
Are you forgetting SMS speak? People used to have 160 characters or less
This SCOTUS has openly lied about what the constitution requires.
Watching a person fall apart on their own crushes their followers' motivation
He was part of the crowd mocking this
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/13/nyregion/ryan-carson-murder.html
First look into a good instance for hosting a community. Some allow anybody to create communities, some don't. Some also have server side spam filters ready.
Denouncing empathy and celebrating the deaths of progressives made him radical. Don't let yourself believe the extreme right who pretend to represent everybody who fell for the propaganda and voted right. Most of them were sold on nebulous promised of "making things better" and fear of others.
This is why moderators should use a separate account for moderation actions than their main