Not_mikey

joined 3 months ago
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

Probably also killed a lot of elderly or immunocompromised adults since he lobbied against a covid vaccine becoming open source.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The only one I'd give you shit for is andre 3000 on the right since he's been around forever and the outfit matches him perfectly.

The rest are unknowns to anyone not deep into the met galaxy and pop culture

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Cars, heating and meat consumption will do that. Yeah the top .1% taking there private jets around is doing a lot more damage then your average middle class westerner but that person driving there car and eating beef everyday are doing a lot more damage then your average person living in east and south asia.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

It is horribly under covered by mainstream press and does have atrocities equivalent to the war on gaza. The Sudanese military has kicked the rapid support forces (rsf) out of most of the east and capital region, but the rsf holds a lot of the west / darfur region except for the city of al fasher which is currently under siege and probably has conditions comparable to Gaza in terms of lack of food and water coming in.

The reason no one is out protesting or trying to raise awareness is because we (the west) can't do anything about it. We aren't supporting either side and shouldn't be, the RSF is worse but the Sudanese military has no shortage of war crimes. So we have no leverage to try and get a ceasefire, whereas in Israel we continue to send them billions in military aid to continue a genocidal war. We could tell them to take peace talks seriously or we cut off aid any day now but refuse to because trump wants a new beach resort.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Cool, another state race to the bottom for tax incentives. This always works out great for all involved, i.e. Production companies and major studios.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

It's cutting both ways, Israel is using Sudan for whataboutism. Saw this bill board on the 101 the other day

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Boxy Bulgaria becomes boxier.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We have bottle deposit in some states in the u.s. Some do it better than others though, grew up in Michigan and there any place that sold bottles had to be able to return them and a lot of the grocery stores had the machines. Moved to California and it seems like none of the stores are set up for it and the cashier will often turn you to a recycling center.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Housing as an investment leads to real estate speculation which pushes up prices. It creates a class of people who stand to gain when property values, and downstream of that rent, go up.

This class of people are very wealthy and tend to oppose any action that will decrease there property value. That includes things like building dense affordable housing, especially close to them, as that increases the supply of housing and thus decreases there property value.

This is true especially for land lords, even small "mom and pop" landlords. There goal is to raise rent and the value of there investment. Anything that will lower rent or even stabilize it like rent control they will oppose, no matter their scale.

Tl;dr: housing speculation creates a wealthy class of people opposed to housing affordability.

 

The u.s. produces a surplus of staples, especially corn and soybeans that are exported mostly to China. If China does retaliatory tarriffs won't that lower demand for those staples and thus the price in the US? And theoretically couldn't that also reduce the price of downstream animal products since feeding them will be cheaper?

This assumes:

  1. Food companies don't use the excuse of tarriffs to raise prices even when there costs go down
  2. The government doesn't step in to back stop corn demand and buy tonnes of it to keep prices high. I know they did this with dairy in the 70s and 80s, not sure if they still do it.
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago

another of these clearly illegal things

They seem to be actually doing work. Yeah it's illegal to work without authorization but by the same logic an undocumented migrant working is illegal. Sure but I wouldn't argue it's immoral or would make them a rogue state.

There's plenty of other horrible shit that north Korea is doing, but I wouldn't put this in that bucket, this is probably the most honest work they can do considering they're sanctioned by nearly every country.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Interesting that it is a very clear downward trend. Hopefully this is a sign that more and more people realize the two parties are failing them and are ready for a shake up.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In general the president has been gaining power over the past 50 years as congress has become more gridlocked and inept.

Now we're at the point where a president can bomb a foreign country backed only by the approval of his buddies in a signal chat.

 

Idk if media rants are allowed on here but didn't know where else to post.

For context righteous gemstones is a comedy about the children of a mega church pastor who try to succeed him and lead the church despite there horrible personalities. Generally makes fun of the hypocrisy of these rich church pastors pretty well.

The first episode of the newest season is a flashback to the civil war and the origins of the family. It opens with the ancestor of the gemstones shooting a southern pastor preaching about "states rights" after the service. At first I thought this would be great, this guys gonna go around killing confederates like django. Sadly no he just did it to rob the pastor then goes on to impersonate him as a pastor for the confederates on the Frontline. The rest of the show centers on him being a horrible pastor and focuses on how bad this con man is compared to the soldiers. It then ends with the union capturing his unit and committing a war crime by executing all of them except him.

The depiction of the civil war is completely white washed and focuses on making the confederate soldiers sympathetic children suffering and dying for there country. Slavery is never mentioned, there are no slaves or black people shown, none of the confederates even say anything racist.

I understand that portraying all the confederates as ultra racists with every other word out of there mouth being the n word would be inaccurate. It would've been funnier if they did and then we watched them get mowed down by the union, but for some reason this episode they tried to be serious. If you are going to be serious and pretend like this is an accurate portrayal then whitewashing them is just as bad as painting them as evil racists. I get there trying to humanize people often cast as the bad guys but removing there flaws isn't humanizing, it's veneration.

The rest of the season seems to be fine and pretty unrelated, so if you do want to watch it go ahead and skip the first episode, wont miss much unless you want to learn about the lost cause myth and how a lot of southerners still view the war.

 

The representatives who signed it are:

Rashida Thalib, Michigan

Mark Pocan, Wisconsin

Nydia Velazquez, New York

Delia Ramirez, Illinois

Ilhan Omar, Minnesota

Jasmine Crocket, Texas

Summer Lee, Pennsylvania

Ayanna Presley, Massachusetts

Latefah Simon, California

Al Green, Texas

Gwen Moore, Wisconsin

Andre Carson, Indiana

Nikema Williams, Georgia

James Mcgovern, Massachusetts

view more: next ›