Ooops

joined 1 year ago
[–] Ooops@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

"Unknown" is browsers blocking trackers from identifying them. So mostly Linux and some people running Firefox with blockers on other systems.

"Windows" is Windows users and also many Linux users who changed their bowser's user agent to circumvent sites that sabotage browsers on Linux for no reason.

"ChromeOS" is -again- Linux as it's based on open ChromiumOS which is derived from Gentoo. (And Google is planning to switch to Android soon... which is again running on top of Linux.)

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 27 points 1 day ago

Wieso tun wir denn überhaupt so, als wäre es Sinn der Sache Jobs zu retten? Es geht darum, sich Geld und Gefälligkeit von der fossile Brennstoffe Branche zu verdienen. Den Leuten, die ihre Jobs verlieren, kann man danach einfach erklären, dass die Ausländer und Grünen Schuld sind. Die glauben eh jede hinrverbrannte Scheiße. Und 'nen Vorwand dann "für die Wirtschaft" noch mehr Geld zu seinen reichen Freunden zu scheffeln ist auch direkt da. Win-Win-Win... besser kann's doch kaum laufen.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, actually just minutes after this comment I saw the latest joke at Spiegel writing about far-right European parties and the AfD in Germany in particular building up connections with MAGA in the US... while just -and totally concidently of course- forgetting to say a single word about the fact the the governing CDU did exactly the same and there are several loud massive MAGA-fanbois in their leading ranks right now.

That's not journalism. That's a laughable "Look over there! Nothing happening here"-diversion.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Einen ganzen Artikel über Kontaktpflege und Beziehungen von rechtsaußen Parteien zu MAGA schreiben.

Die Kontaktpflege und Beziehungen der C*U Führung zu MAGA ignorieren.

Ist das noch #Medienversagen oder schon dreiste Verarsche?

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 13 points 2 days ago

Und doch ist die Reaktion deutscher Medien in 95% der Fälle auch den absurdesten neuen Hirnfurz aus MAGA-Kreisen sofort als neue geopolitische Realität (plus ganz viel Rechtfertigung, warum es gar nicht total verrückt ist) darzustellen...

Hilft halt nichts, 'ne Kolumne abzudrucken, die über "post-faktische" Politik redet, wenn man den Rest der Zeit dabei mitmacht...

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Sorry, but no.

There is nothing left even remotely resembling journalism and they only focus on Trump so they can ignore the MAGA friends in Germany's goverment doing variations of the exact same shit.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 22 points 2 days ago

Joke aside...

Who has not reached that "just say yes so they shut up"-point with some people?

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

Wants to be Pro but doesn't even do it recursive...

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

Vielleicht doch besser die Version mit ~~menschlicher~~ merzlicher Unterhälfte?

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 59 points 2 days ago

Close. The correct answer is: "Lol! No! Fuck off!"

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hübsche Verkleidungen gibt's immer erst später für die Werbung, die auf private Endkunden ausgerichtet ist.

Für die Forschung muss es nur funktionieren:

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

it’s quite obvious to everyone, including the press and citizens, that the current implementation is not sustainable long-term.

No, that's just the neolibaral capitalist propaganda talking. The actual unsustainable part are the less than 1% sucking up most of the money while the remaining fraction is supposed to sustain social, health and pension system from their stagnating wages.

It's actually very easy to look up facts and numbers. The rate between people working and people sustained by them has basically not changed in nearly a century. Sure, children/pensioneer rate changed but that isn't actually a problem as long as the general rate keeps steady. And as long as the workers don't suddenly become much less productive of course.

Funnily the systems worked in the 1950s, in the 1970s, in the 1990s... and then with -as mentioned- roughly the same amount of workers in the total population AND a massively increasing productivity (GDP per capita increased to ~x2,5 in the last 50 years; naturally caused by the exact same progress that also raises life expectancy) it suddenly didn't work anymore and we have to constantly increase the quota of wages workers have to spend on health and social costs. (And the same is true for taxes: how can countries that build infrastructure once fail to even sustain them nowadays?) So what actually changed?

The aswer is quite easy. Up until the 1990s (in Germany... but we see the same bullshit happening in other countries, sometimes a few years earlier, sometimes a bit later) wages and pensions kept in pace with the GDP. And then neoliberalists sold the fairy tale of privatisation and other means of not only funneling money to the top but also stopping to tax that money. And while wages stagnated the whole system was still linked those wages.

Seriously... production per capita is high as never before yet -magically- neither health, social and pension contributions based on those wages nor basic public functions based on taxes are sustainable anymore? If you seriously believe the constant propaganda of how you (or better those indolent youngsters) are just lazy and need to remember how to be productive, how <insert whoever is in the government right now) is just wasting money for nonsense, and -most importantly!- how we only need to get rid of all those lazy immigrants exploiting us, I have this really fancy bridge here that...

Als Anschauungsmaterial:

Wenn du also das nächste mal in einem unbedeutend scheinenden Nebensatz das Wort "Binnennachfrage" hörst, denk einfach mal darüber nach, wieso sich Menschen in einem der reichsten Länder der Welt nichts mehr leisten können, während die Milliardäre im Land ihr Vermögen alle paar Jahre (in Krisenzeit tatsächlich noch schneller) verdoppeln.

view more: next ›