PhilipTheBucket

joined 2 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 17 points 1 month ago

My sister had a cat who was declawed (not by her), medicated, old, sort of inbred, and had lived inside all his life. A more harmless cat you could barely imagine. He regularly found it a challenge to drink his water without fucking it up, and spent a lot of time just staring at the wall.

He once found a moth that was already damaged when he got to it, and successfully killed it. He carried the moth around in his mouth, clearly basking in the intoxicating flood of pride of the hunter he was feeling, for almost an hour before eating the whole thing.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 16 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Hopefully the idiots who run these tech companies will learn their lesson soon.

"If the thing is free, you're the product" applies just as much to dinners at the White House as it does to social media apps.

Rumsfeld more or less bragged about it too, a lot of that crowd did. We haven't had a serial killer in the White House for a few years, so it's an adjustment back (and of course Trump is such an overtly vicious person that it'll have a new flavor now), but this stuff is not new for Republicans.

(Actually Biden and Bush Sr. are the only two presidents since Carter that I can remember that weren't fans of blowing up random people directly with US forces for no reason. In Afghanistan they did an airstrike on a wedding.)

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

And you want to criticize the voters instead of the politicians.

My guy you are posting under an article which I posted, which is criticizing the politicians. Sounds great.

When I am king, anyone who start filling in both sides of the argument by telling the person they're arguing, what it is that that person is arguing, will be sent straight to the Internet Reeducation Camps.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Not at all wrong, no, I am joining in that complaining. I'm just pointing out the conspicuous lack of much corresponding effort by the same people to talk up Mamdani himself.

It seems kinda weird that making sure Kamala Harris lost the election, to teach the Democrats a lesson about genocide, doesn't come alongside making sure that Mamdani wins the election, to teach the Democrats a lesson about genocide. Right? If they were who they claimed to be then you would think that the people who cared a lot about the first thing and talked about it a lot would also now be talking about the second one a lot, right?

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I mean honestly, US presidents killing random people and families the world over for literally no reason is nothing new. On the scale of Trump stuff, this is pretty minor, as sad as that is to say.

Yeah. In any country with a sane Overton window, it would be a normal conservative paper. But for some reason in the American spectrum it's this wildly liberal thing.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Here's one example:

https://lemmy.world/search?q=push&type=Comments&listingType=All&creatorId=580006&page=1&sort=Controversial

You can see him relentlessly criticizing Biden, ostensibly to "push Biden to fight harder," or "push the Dems to CHANGE." or "holding Biden accountable," and a nonstop stream about how he's super helping when he agitates for people not to vote for Democrats.

Then there's this:

https://lemmy.world/search?q=mamdani&type=Comments&listingType=All&creatorId=580006&page=1&sort=Controversial

This is a person who posts thousands of comments about politics, who cares deeply about leftist causes, and really wants to make leftist progress with the election...

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Someone on Reddit asked one of their editors during an AMA why they covered Biden's flaws in such eager and abundant detail, and gave Trump a free pass on so much heinous nonsense. His answer was more or less that Trump was popular and Biden wasn't, so their coverage needed to reflect that.

They had multiple columnists who were sort of "Non-death-camp Republicans," I remember one of them was a black guy. The whole thing was fuckin' stupid from the jump, although they did sort of return to a more reality leaning once Trump won and it became a little bit clearer how bad it could get.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social -4 points 1 month ago (17 children)

Lemmy: "Let's push the Democrats to the left by refusing to vote for Kamala Harris, basically threaten to end the world unless our demands are met"

Lemmy when Mamdani starts successfully pushing the Democrats left: "I am suddenly motivated to spend a lot of energy whining about how bad the Democrats are"

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

https://archive.is/20250729210514/https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/29/opinion/trump-president-policy-success.html

This you?

Hope it was worth it, you clowns. They're definitely coming for you, too, even AJ and the "good ones."

It's not for them. It's for the rest of the crowd. The next time one of them thinks, "Well maybe I should turn this terrified child over to the ICE officers who showed up at my workplace asking about them," they'll remember all those wild cheers at the end, and the man shaking his withered finger and speaking. It's like water cutting a pathway through the rocks.

view more: ‹ prev next ›