Pippipartner

joined 1 year ago
[–] Pippipartner@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Plastic in my gut

Plastic in my lung

And the other too

Plastic in my blood

Plastic plastic

Plastic in my wiener

And in my seed

Plastic in my telephone

Plastic in my brain

Plastic plastic

Brain plastic

[Edit formatting is hard]

[–] Pippipartner@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Well that joke didn't go well with the crowed.

[–] Pippipartner@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 months ago

Deine Meinung ist ungültig da nicht in einem selbst compulierten CLI Browser erstellt.

[–] Pippipartner@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago

Es wundert mich nicht, dass meine "Fish-Linux" (BSD Kugelfisch) Referenz auf BSD nicht verstanden wurde. Halt einfach keine echten Nerds hier...

[–] Pippipartner@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Ich nehme nur Meinungen entgegen von Leuten die Fish-Linux from Scratch auf ihrem main device betreiben.

[–] Pippipartner@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Deine Frage ist irrelevant da nicht GPG signiert.

[–] Pippipartner@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

It also includes a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license for the purpose of doing as you request with the content you input in Firefox. This does not give Mozilla any ownership in that content.

It's still in the current version of the TOS without a direct explanation which can be found anywhere close to it. This is plain bad from a communication stand point.

[–] Pippipartner@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

To be fair nobody asked Mozilla to serve a stupid and detached statement without contextualizing what they meant or try to achieve.

[Edit] it feels like they're asking for the outrage. You can't just drop assurances of not selling data without explaining if your crowd is privacy aware. You can't take broad licenses from your users if you don't explain for what they are for. Having plaintext comment next to the lawyer speak would have fixed all that and none of this had to be this shitty. [/Edit]

[–] Pippipartner@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 3 months ago

I would like to recommend the following order of presenting the argument:

I didn't follow your advice because it relays on me not having ADHD and therefore is useless.

view more: ‹ prev next ›