Psyhackological

joined 2 years ago
[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

They are getting closer to this but also I think those projects emerged from being old and unorganized so they want to do it decently.

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, but also companies say that Linux support is not worth it (gaining money and spending on the support) compared to - slapping barely working Windows port and call it a day.

For now Linux support is more like pleasant surprise than a official respected thing.

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For me it was always a niche that wasn't taken full advantage of.

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

Let me clarify myself

*It's impossible to get big corporate guys attention so they ship Linux by default and it's clearly tested. For now the Valve, System76, Framework and Tuxedo are exception.

Edit: Also I was keeping in mind corporate entity behind OS.

  • Apple - MacOS
  • Microsoft - Windows
  • ? - Linux
[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

List me what is standardized on Linux.

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah but you can have default choices that are guarantee to work.

And yeah preinstalled checked hardware would be ideal.

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Let's say something like systemd standarization.

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This "vintage" look seems so interesting for me and I don't know why...

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

But outdated :c

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least on Linux you can have some kind of control while on Windows or Mac there is an illusion like "can't do that, fuck you", while Linux is like "can do that... will you manage"?

view more: ‹ prev next ›