QuarkVsOdo

joined 3 months ago
[–] QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

She is a black women : Minus 500 Points for Gryfindor.

She walks in in a businessdress and looks as intimidating as the mortage lady from the bank: Minus 600 Points for Gryfindor

Her Party is made up from literal Fossils that won't give up power, even past 80, won't stop Making money from what seems like Stocktrading on privileged information: Minus 50 Points for Gryfindor.

She is as charismatic as Porridge: Minus 100 Points for Gryfindor.

Seriously fuck the bitch ass american racists and the democratic party that can't find a good candidate when so much is on the line.

[–] QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Well than don't operate within the US.

The Maga aßholes want to be hateful on the internet without getting moderated. Without moderation it's okay that the plattform becomes the publisher and is liable. I'd not be sad for meta/reddit/Twitter to just implode on legal fees.. owning the fake news they allow to be distributed..while making money off advertisers..

[–] QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

If "Section 230" is repealed by the Maga-Idiots any US social media plattfrom will become liable for what the user's posts, they will have to do MUCH cleanup.

Any threat. Any wrongful accusation, and harm done to reputation will be OWNED not by the user in question.. but the company providing the plattform, as if they are a newspaper and all users are staff writers.

Imagine writing "Dodge only make shitty cars that break all the time" on X, and X is now held accountable by Stellantis for damaging their reputation.

I hope they do it. Plattforms that make billions from free work of the users, should own the liabilities.

[–] QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

All bars who support "having sex for fun" should do this.

I don't support sex being limited to marriage and procreation and otherwise shamed.. and even outlawed.

[–] QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

So many people use "Chat Jippity" to look up stuff. I know google is enshitificated.. but OH MY GOD.

After having mostly relevant Information available for everyone, the zone was flooded with Advertisement and FakeNews, and now the FakeNews are generated directly on the User's device.. no interaction and connection to anyone necessary.

[–] QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Generative AI is peaking in it's ability to produce cringe boomer memes from a prompt. Everything else.. MEH.

[–] QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

yeah don't follow that

"X marks the Rot"

[–] QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Yes and no. The engines and upright landing is very good... designing&Testing unbound by yearly grant applications but with "fuck you money" really propelled the industry forward.

But they cut so many corners.

[–] QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (11 children)

Like all his others companies.

  • SpaceX has exploding star ships
  • StarLink comes with so many ties, that alternatives are highly sought after
  • Neural link might already be defunct, I don't know
  • His stake in OpenAI is too complicated to follow
  • Tesla has 3 models you could buy, none of them is FSD yet, one is the Cyberstuck, no truck, no robots.
  • Boring company was just fluff and BS, since a tunnel that's only 1 lane wide is a safety nightmare and hyperloop is like the simpisons "monorail" Episode

Maybe at some point in his mid 50ties he should have focused on one thing.

[–] QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think setting a stoploss and then just stay in/ cash out automaticly is also completely viable (as long as your trading fees of cashing out and re-enter are well covered by total earnings so far)

Taxes are another thing though.

[–] QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Pray to the great treasury on ferengina.

[–] QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

No, I just thought about how normal people are fucked over. In systems with public pensions, politicians could just cut the pensions, in a property and investment based system, you have to make the "lifetime savings" of the lower 95% just not liveable by greedflation, concentration of wealth and volatile markets that eat up savings - and don't allow sub-billionaires to hedge.

view more: next ›