I haven't had this exact experience, but I struggled to game on linux for years before I asked my self why I was struggling to prove nothing to nobody when I could just not.
Renegade
joined 2 years ago
Grant +2 to Panhandling using Deceive when you pay a fate point.
I am probable pretty late responding to this, but I feel it shouldnt cost a fatepoint. Its a common patter to get a +2 to a skill in situation. Each stunt is meant to be roughly as powerful as a fate point. This is like having a panhandling aspect rather than a stunt.
As for other stunts, you might make one for a +2 in a situation using your hacking skill, or one that uses your hacking skill instead of another skill your character is weak in.
BTW a watchdogs themed campaign sounds cool.
I think it depends on the game. I am studying the Blades in the Dark rulebook and really loving the detail. I think what makes a big difference is that the details provided feel like they would actually help with GM prep. This is a first for me. So many modules and rule books provide details while somehow being utterly useless. My advice would be to play test the system and only write down the kinds of details that actually made a difference in your prep and games. There is such a night and day difference I am feeling with this rulebook and I dont think its at all obvious to the casual observer. Got to get out of that author mindset and into a gm one. Thow out all that inspiration drivel and make actual facts out of the world that would matter and lead to plothooks for a campaign. ... that is if you want to, generic systems are good too.
Missed this give-away first time around. This is redemption!
Is it actually the most complex simulation?
You could close vents to some rooms and thus prioritize cooling to certain areas but for most homes its probable not anywhere close to perfect.
Health data protections should not just be limited to "covered entities".
If I recal, this site is a side project by one of the brave devs but dont discount the results. Brave is decent these days but its not perfect across all use cases. For example, Mozilla's container extension is a very powerful privacy tool.
My personal opinion:
For normal every day desktop usage Firefox or Brave. For mobile, Bromite. Tor browser here for specific workflows.
It's funny because it's sad because it's true.
The industry for selling security products to end users has become a pile of ineffective and misleading products. On Windows, I would recommend sticking with the built in stuff, unless you have a stong usecase that you know another product will better meet. On linux I would generally expect a sophistocated enough user that antivirus is not needed or helpful.
The recovery codes come as a set of numbers