Which is ridiculous, everybody knows that the reason you should be banned from referencing Wikipedia as a source is because an encyclopedia is not a source
Revan343
This was organized, the rest of the party is in agreement; these ones were just the ones to fall on the sword because they're the ones who can't be punished
Sure we could capture one, but if your enemy wants to sell you their hardware before the fighting kicks off so you can get to work early, it'd be insane to pass that up.
We're already committed to some number, I don't remember how many. It would be insane to order any more, or to rely on them in combat.
The distinction between ideological Nazis vs capitalists who are going with it for money is a pointless one; do you know what we call people who supported Hitler for business reasons?
We call them Nazis.
The next three boxes are jury, soap, and ammo. I suspect it will come to the last one
Ideally we would want a couple F-35s anyways, to dissect
He'd have an easy shot as Premier
Fuck off
Only works if the NDP are smart enough to not also lean right

If we're being pedantic, yeah, but 'source' without qualifiers to me would refer to the one you'd cite. Wikipedia is great for finding general information, and then as you say, finding the source for that information (and also generally a lot more depth to the summary that's on Wiki).
Tl;dr use Wiki, don't cite Wiki