Robaque

joined 2 years ago
[–] Robaque@feddit.it 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

After all, that's how all labels work (and perhaps even words in general?). They try to capture meaning, at best failing to do so (endlessly "approaching" it, always a step behind the evolution of language), and at worst ensaring peoples' thoughts and ideas.

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

ohhhhhhh 🤦

Wait... what about gay couples where one of the guys is the biological father?

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Uhm... sorry to ask, but does that make your dad your "ejaculating progenitor"?

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The smile/wrinkles look kinda weird? Could be a generated image of Altman, plus photoshop

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 12 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

iirc China doesn't allow dual citizenship

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Didn't Grok also claim he's fitter than LeBron and smarter than da Vinci? Perhaps being an olympic piss drinker has been the key to his success.

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Probably not even mint-specific since it happens on pop os too

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 0 points 1 month ago

I've articulated why. Are you just here to argue in bad faith?

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Lol what? Are you a troll? Or a bot?

Fallacy is just faulty reasoning, I don't need to know all the ins and outs of how philosophers/logicians categorise them to know how to point out faulty reasoning. Knowing how to reason about things is far more important than throwing around buzzwords.

You accuse me of not being studious, yet you refuse to actually engage with what I say - you know what kind of fallacy that is? An ad hominem. Even a supposed ignoramus like me knows that. I wonder what that makes you?

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I guess it's easy to convince yourself of that when you haven't really engaged with what I said, lol

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Hey, idk all the names people have made up to categorise fallacies, but I do know you misapplied the no true scotsman fallacy over a semantic disagreement, or at least a misunderstanding.

 

Jamrock Hobo's response to People Make Game's investigation

 

Jamrock Hobo's response to People Make Game's investigation

 

Jamrock Hobo's response to People Make Game's investigation

view more: next ›