SamB

joined 2 years ago
[–] SamB@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

Journalists should now do the job of a government? Bad bot

[–] SamB@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It’s actually that simple. Why complicate things. If you bothered to look at Putin a history, you would know what he had been up to all this time.

[–] SamB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Hey, this is broken. What if I dedicate my life fixing it, that would be cool. That’s how I found my meaning.

[–] SamB@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No. You have got to split search and ads. Otherwise the web search is going to disappear completely and replaced by social media and ai. It’s for Google s own good.

[–] SamB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, there’s the whole ai thing. I don’t know, I got the (clearly wrong) idea that a dedicated sub may have dedicated specialists..

[–] SamB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can they even see that I am not using the official app?

[–] SamB@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I admit I got quite a bit worked up with the constant greenwashing found everywhere and got a bit paranoid about contributing to the problem. I will have to talk a bit more with some specialists from the labs that I will be collaborating with (hopefully they won’t tell me what I want to hear, but be honest) and perhaps I find a solution. If all fails, then fragrance free it is..

[–] SamB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I admit I was taken aback by the certifications provided by pure oils. I will talk about it with a few labs and see if perhaps things could work. Although I still would have preferred to go with something 100 percent safe.

[–] SamB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I still use Apollo, so nobody gets a dime from me anyway.

[–] SamB@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Seriously, things have gotten so bad there , the website is unrecognizable from years ago.. I am sorry you didn’t have the platform to vent when needed. Hopefully here it will be better.

[–] SamB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I actually checked a few options and anything fragrant is outside the water for pollinators, which makes sense. I also did check essential oils from water lilies and still hazardous to water life.. the search continues.

[–] SamB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don’t know if there are any pleasantly fragrant aquatic plants. I will check it out, this is a neat idea.

 

I posted the following: "I am trying to make a shower gel that has a scent but is not toxic to either humans or aquatic life. And I have a hard time finding anything for the latter. Essential oils and derivatives? Nope. Synthetic ones? Nothing. I could go the unscented route, but it’s going to be hard to sell. So, considering that most of you are better informed about this topic, is there a specific ingredient that I can use for a rose fragrance that’s truly non toxic? Thanks "

On fragrange, zerowaste and sustainability. The post got deleted by mods in a manner of minutes. What the hell is going on there? I am going to stay here for much longer since that place is turning very weird. Also, can anyone here actually help me find a fragrance ingredient that won't kill aquatic life when poured down the drain? Thank you in advance

 

If you are curious whether Ubiquiti ditched the fan on the new U7 Pro Max, well, I have some bad news for you. I opened the device and this is the teardown video.

 

Ladies and gentle gents, I give you yet another marvelous router review, this time from China (hopefully with the doors closed in the back)

 

Skip the gloomy tech news a bit and just enjoy some good ol' router reviews with tests and stuff.

 

This may be an unpopular opinnion.. Let me get this straight. We get big tech corporations to read the articles of the web and then summarize to me, the user the info I am looking for. Sounds cool, right? Yeah, except that why in the everloving duck would I trust Google, Microsoft, Apple or Meta to give me the correct info, unbiased and not curated? The past experiences all show that they will not do the right thing. So why is everyone so OK with what's going on? I just heard that Google may intend to remove sources. Great, so it's like trust me bro.

 

I tested the Intel BE200 and the Qualcomm NCM865 using the EnGenius ECW536 and these are the results that I got.

 

If you were planning to get an Intel WiFi 7 PCI adapter, watch this video first. I checked the single-client throughput using both BE200 and a WiFi 6E adapter. And the results were .... underwhelming.

 

It seems that Intel is gatekeeping WiFi 7 and I analyzed the options that we currently have.

 

I recently finished testing the ASUS RT-AX88U Pro and you can see for yourself the results that I got.

But this is not entirely the point of this post. The problem is that the search engines have become weird, so I need to ask you, the user, if this type of content is useful.

So please let me know if the type of tests that I ran are useful and clear enough. If I can add something or need to remove specific info.

I also intend to move towards video format and to be honest, translating all this written info into a comprehensive video is incredibly overwhelming.

Which is why I need your advice about what needs to be improved. Thank you!

 

I asked this same question on Reddit and I got zero engagement, so perhaps Lemmy has people that care more about their hardware.

I recently decided to use some of the tools provided by Mr Salter (netburn) and I have to ask the community if you want to see multi-client stress tests (4K streaming, VoIP, web browsing) used on a wireless router or if the single-client iperf tests are good enough. Bear in mind that pretty much all publications that still test their devices (most don't) rely on the single-client test method.

view more: next ›