ScrumblesPAbernathy

joined 2 years ago
[–] ScrumblesPAbernathy@readit.buzz 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would be for removing AA of they removed LA as well. Because they didn't, their motivation is clear. If we agree that both are wrong then removing only one shows that they're ok with the other.

[–] ScrumblesPAbernathy@readit.buzz 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

As a white, I think whites should be ground into bread. They should be shot into space as bread where they can expand to fit the container they're placed in while in microgravity. This isn't hypocrisy, it's cosmic baking. Get in the rocket with me, brother.

[–] ScrumblesPAbernathy@readit.buzz 0 points 2 years ago (5 children)

This would be a good point if it weren't for all of the systemic racism that tilts the scales towards white people from before the birth of the country into the present day.

Slavery, Jim Crow, chain gangs, loitering laws, segregation, redlining, political violence, lynching, the war on drugs, the school to prison pipeline, school districts funded by local property taxes, longer criminal sentences for black people, school voucher programs, outlawing the teaching of black history.

[–] ScrumblesPAbernathy@readit.buzz 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

While I'm on the same side as you (and not the person you're responding to), this response is bad and you should feel bad.

[–] ScrumblesPAbernathy@readit.buzz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Removing legacy admissions would help a lot. I've seen people arguing that admissions are a zero sub game. If someone gets in because of AA then someone else didn't get in. Ending legacy admissions would free up a much larger portion of admissions for a more diverse student body to get in, instead of some rich person's dumbass kid.

[–] ScrumblesPAbernathy@readit.buzz 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

They just removed affirmative action which hurts underserved minorities. They didn't touch legacy admissions which benefits rich white people. What they're doing is transparently racist. If they wanted a meritocracy why not bar legacy admissions as well?

True, the Aussies have been making a good show of it.

Stockton Rush is a killer and should be charged posthumously with four counts of negligent homicide. He's just as culpable, if not more, that someone who gets behind the wheel drink and kills their passengers.

Wow, I hope Paul can defeat the Harkonen, he could do some real good in the galaxy. What they really need is to put their faith in a charismatic leader.

Also, I'm sad that Duncan Idaho died. I feel like if he lived there's no chance he would become insufferable in the distant future.

The issue with this approach is that it further entrenches gaps that are already there. The best predictor of economic outcome is zip code. That's because schools are funded by local property tax. Live in a wealthier area, get better schools. Better schools lead to a better outcome. Schools in poorer districts stay poorer. It's a system that is self perpetuating.

Replacing affirmative action with something that is strictly income based could help but that ignores other systemic biases that are based on race rather that income.

I feel like if we're ending affirmative action we should also put in place more restrictions on legacy admissions which is just affirmative action for dumb, rich kids and represents a much bigger chunk of students than affirmative action ever did.

[–] ScrumblesPAbernathy@readit.buzz 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We're not talking about punishing anyone, we just don't want to hear or see their bigotry. They can have their space and we can choose not to interact with them.

[–] ScrumblesPAbernathy@readit.buzz 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's definitely not lesser known, but my favorite is The Expanse.

view more: ‹ prev next ›