StugStig

joined 3 years ago
[–] StugStig@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The only Nintendo console I ever had was a Famiclone so I don't really have much nostalgia for their games.

It's just Nintendo ROMs that are disappearing. It's still easier than ever to find even the most obscure classic PC games on abandonware sites and GOG compilation torrents. It's also only the SEO abusing ROM sites that are vulnerable to Nintendo's attacks. Complete ROMsets for their consoles can still be obtained through torrents, Vimm.net, and the r/ROMs megathread especially for the older cartridge consoles.

Emulating a current gen Nintendo console has never been as good as it is for Switch emulators. Any new PC can emulate Switch Triple As at full speed. Android is getting builds of the Yuzu emulator and mobile SOCs have enough power to run less demanding titles. When a lot people who don't even own a Switch can play Tears of the Kingdom, Nintendo is understandably trying to crack down. The portable aspect of the Switch is no longer a unique advantage. It used to be just GPD making those handheld PCs now every brand is trying to compete in that form factor.

Honestly I think the state of emulation in general is experiencing a golden age.

Retroid, Anbernic and AYN are making hardware that is a better solution for most people than trying to jailbreak and refurbish old original portable consoles. The screens, the analogs and the buttons they use are as good if not better than the first party hardware. Unlike bulky handheld PC, their Linux or Android based emulation handhelds are still in the same size and weight class as the PSP.

A couple years ago the Xbox 360 and PS3 emulators were basically just experimental demos. They weren't stable enough to actually finish any game on and most CPUs weren't fast enough to run them at full speed. They're still hit and miss but the list of playable titles will only ever grow.

It has come to the point that the PC can play everything. All previous gen consoles aside from the OG Xbox have emulators at a playable state. There are almost no current gen console exclusives anymore as the PC is getting ports of PS4/PS5 exclusives, the XBone/Series never had any to begin with, and of coarse the aforementioned Switch emulation.

[–] StugStig@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 years ago

Being given access to accurate intel is no guarantee that they actually leverage it to form their own views.

There are anecdotes of US officials using mainstream media to spoonfeed them their positions on issues as they can't be assed to do anything resembling actual work.

[–] StugStig@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

US mainstream media isn't even trustworthy for predicting the US economy.

They downplayed if not outright denied the potential causes of the Great Recession until well after it had already occurred. They then portrayed the Great Recession "from the perspective of the Obama Administration and big business" manipulating the empathy of their audience in order to serve the interests of their true masters.

[–] StugStig@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Asian Knockoff Mexicans

Mail order brides for those who can't afford Eastern Europeans or East Asians

To the IQ obsessed HBD types, having the lowest PISA scores in Southeast Asia means we're more Honorary Black than Honorary Aryan on the racial totem pole.

[–] StugStig@lemmygrad.ml 39 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

There were Soviet nukes placed in Ukraine with a preplanned trajectory to hit the west and needed authorization from the CPSU in Moscow to be fired.

Ukraine never had nukes. They didn't have the ability to maintain and control the arsenal that was placed there.

[–] StugStig@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 years ago

It's conventional warfare, not guerilla warfare, nor a suicide bombing campaign. The worst case scenario would resemble the Iran-Iraq war and the initial conditions resembled Northern Cyprus more than Afghanistan.

The Ukrainians don't really even have an equivalent to the Viet Cong. Insurgencies need the support of the local populace to eat and operate without being ratted out. Only Kherson is even close to divided enough for that to have a remote chance of occurring.

The terrain and culture of Ukraine aren't like Afghanistan. Afghans are more loyal to their tribes than Kabul. The underdeveloped subsistence farming economy of Afghanistan means any insurgent knows how to live off the land and survive living in deprivation for long and sustained periods. The terrain of Afghanistan allows insurgents to easily isolate whatever forces the government sends in an attempt to control the countryside. The Taliban won without any state really backing them. The overall population of Ukraine and Afghanistan might be similar but what matters most is the demographic in the age range for military service.

Syria didn't turn into an Afghanistan. The Donbass republics fended for themselves for 8 years while the DRA only lasted 3 years alone. Even then the DRA still outlasted the Soviet Union so had material support continued they might've continued on as a rump state. It wasn't like the US puppet, Ghani's regime, which just collapsed immediately after the US pullout.

Ukrainians are more Northern Alliance than Taliban. Their ideology isn't anywhere near as unified as the Taliban's. The moderate liberals and extremist fascists would turn on each other if living conditions deteriorated sharply.

There can be no defeat either. Pulling out would be political suicide for anyone in the Kremlin. Abandoning Russians in Russian territory would be different from abandoning the DRA. Nukes would fall before Crimea falls.

Anyway, you can't really predict the future by looking at the past. The similarities are only down to hindsight and brute force exhaustion of every possible historical parallel.

[–] StugStig@lemmygrad.ml 61 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If the Russians were even half as petty and image obsessed as the Ukrainians are, they'd fire a missile into that trident.

 
[–] StugStig@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 2 years ago

Overextend, turn your enemy into insurgents, attempt to kill every one ~~over ten~~ of the "military aged males", cause a global financial crisis, as a million people die due to your shit pandemic handling pull-out

The US is worse than Ukraine. They send their vassals to death without a second thought but with an inevitable betrayal. Yet if they ever fought a war in their own land for once, they'd quickly lose the will and ability to fight.

[–] StugStig@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 years ago

NASA planing to use SpaceX's Starship as the Human Landing System, has convinced me that China will step foot on the moon before Artemis III.

[–] StugStig@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Nobody ever wants a long, protracted conflict but it doesn't mean they don't prepare for one.

They don't go all out because:

  • The effective number of a weapon is not the raw number but the amount multiplied by the availability rate.

  • Mature platforms have higher availability rates and a larger stockpile of wear parts and ammo.

  • The numbers available can sustain attrition for however long the conflict may endure so they don't run out of crucial weapons system at inopportune times.

  • The latest equipment may still be undergoing service tests or may have a limited amount of trained crews so any deployment would be more like what Zebra mission was to the M26 Pershing.

  • Combat capable forces are still needed elsewhere for security/deterrence and in case South Ossetia gets invaded by Georgia again.

  • Mobilizing the reserves would shrink the working population hurting the economy.

  • Going all out might also cause a full on intervention since NATO membership isn't actually needed for that to happen. SMO like rules are why the US in Vietnam didn't clash with China as it did in Korea.

Availability rates of the F-15 vs F-35 vs F-22

In spite of how much older the F-15 air frames are, given the same number of planes the F-15s would in combat outnumber the F-35s or F-22s two to one.

 
view more: next ›