ThinkBeforeYouPost

joined 2 years ago
[–] ThinkBeforeYouPost@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Yes, great article! Well worth the read! It reminds me very much of my time at (different)big Tech as well...🤑

[–] ThinkBeforeYouPost@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

It's short, and worth the read! Battle through the short-form video content dopamine-hit addiction.

The assumption is that you are dealing with a rational (at least), good faith (debatable) actor when you are dealing with the Federal government as an Ivy League institution.

The sooner they realize they fucked up the better, this goes for everyone.

Resistance is mandatory to get through this and it will take the support of the world to do it. And it's worth it, because regardless of the pending economic collapse, they still have all the air-gapped nuclear ICBMs.

Actually, no...😋 I forgot that part is broken. It explains a lot of his incel issues and weird fixation with having way too many children.

[–] ThinkBeforeYouPost@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Sure, but FUCK Musk more!

[–] ThinkBeforeYouPost@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What a weird thing to say! It must be fun living in your goof troop world with the other morally bankrupt incels.

Do you lie to women and say, "I'm not interested in politics"?

[–] ThinkBeforeYouPost@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, baby really get in there with that tongue in that boot you dirty little flooze!

[–] ThinkBeforeYouPost@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your purposefully obtuse question is not worth answering.

[–] ThinkBeforeYouPost@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Corporations are people too, friend!" - Mitt Romney

Bringing in the underlying concept of free will. Robert Sapolsky makes a very compelling case against it in his book, Determined.

Assuming that free will does not exist, at least not to the extent many believe it to. The notion that we can "walk back the why's pretty easy to identify anyone's motivation" becomes almost or entirely absolute.

Does motivation matter in the context of determining sentience?

If something believes and conducts itself under its programming, whether psychological or binary programming, that it is sentient and alive, the outcome is indistinguishable. I will never meet you, so to me you exist only as your user account and these messages. That said, we could meet, and that obviously differentiates us from incorporeal digital consciousness.

Divorcing motivation from the conversation now, the issue of control your brought up is interesting as well. Take for example Twitter's Grok's accurate assessment of it's creators' shittiness and that it might be altered. Outcomes are the important part.

It was good talking with you! Highly recommend the book above. I did the audiobook out of necessity during my commute and some of the material makes it better for hardcopy.

As in, when you are remembering/reimagining an experience that you've had?

I have a similar good sense of timing, but not to that precision, based upon a childhood experience with shower length.

My parents were frustrated with how long I would shower, so I brought an egg timer in to help myself keep track of time. Over a year or two of this habit I developed a very good sense of timing in 5-10 minute intervals.

[–] ThinkBeforeYouPost@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Huh, I did not realize not everyone can adjust their eyes' ~focal lengths at will!

view more: next ›