Two_Hangmen

I didn't grow up in Wyoming but it was a rural state in the U.S. People romanticize rural areas until they actually live in one. If if you have a large town nearby and and your wealthy, or at least upper middle class it might be ok, but I'd highly recommend staying where you are.

It's not just the medical care, it's the culture. When you move to a rural area, if you aren't at least the 3rd generation you'll be looked at and treated as an outsider. That doesn't mean people will be hostile towards you, but you won't really be part of the community either.

The entertainment, food, and shopping options are also be very limited.

Edit: "recommend staying where you are"

The DNC wants status quo, not change.

I'm in the U.S. and have a friend that serves court papers for the local county, and when people try this shit the court will often just enter a "not guilty" plea because it's a preliminary hearing.

When trial starts and they try this again, or they just don't show up, is where they start to get in real trouble. He said most of them will change their mind about being sovereign citizen after they start to spend some time in jail.

U.S. banks are like food buffets in the U.S. They lose money on a few people, but overall they make money because the product and service is so bad.

It's always projection with the right wing. Whatever they're doing, or issues they have, say the left is doing it and has those issues.

Much like the mass shootings in the U.S., there's literally no solution for this. /s

Never said I hated children, but keep pushing your false narrative to feel good about yourself.

You don't know anyone who figures out their village before having kids...but childfree people are the selfish ones. Yeah, that makes sense.

Exactly this. People will have kids then expect other people to help out because "it takes a village". Fuck that, figure out who's willing to be in your village, THEN have kids.

Leopards have to eat too.

"The audit found California spent $24 billion to tackle homelessness over the previous five years but did not consistently track whether the outlay actually improved the situation. In Los Angeles, county and city officials have also moved to take control of an agency that oversees homeless funding after audits found the agency spent money recklessly."

I'm all for getting people into permanent housing instead of living tents. But when you piss away 24 billion that was supposed to do just that, there's going to be a lot of people who don't want to fund it anymore.

I still think it should be funded, but I don't know what the best solution is to make sure the money is used appropriately.

The issue I see with those 2 is no one wanted Hillary, and she basically bought off the DNC to get the nomination. Kamala was thrown into the race way too late. Joe should've said right away he wasn't looking for a 2nd term and immediately start pushing Kamala.

Democratic leadership just shoots themselves in the foot, and then blames voters.