Uli

joined 2 years ago
[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I think the universe we experience is a mathematical continuum with an added layer of probability.

The problem with trying to describe my theory is that what I'm proposing is literally the simplest thing in the universe. It is the one rule that there are no rules and that by ordering the slices of the continuum into discrete moments of time, all of the rulelessness coalesces into matter and space by virtue of being repeatable probability waveforms which can be represented in 3D space via an emergent 4D manifold.

Even that is already very dense. For more on the manifold, you may refer to the 1983 paper from J.B. Hartle and Stephen Hawking, "The waveform of the Universe."

Imagine you want to take the first moment of time, represented as one whole, and break the next moment of time into two pieces, but knowing that the third moment of time will double again to have four pieces, you want the first piece of the 2nd moment of time to be larger, more like the whole of the 1st moment, and the second piece of the 2nd moment of time to be smaller, more like the quarters of the 3rd moment of time.

Mathematically, you can do this - at least for the first two moments. If you want a magic ratio that you can divide the whole by, and then divide the resulting number by that same ratio such that both of those results added together equal the original whole, there is such a ratio. It is the golden ratio. But it does not follow that continuing to divide by the golden ratio will get you the next four pieces that would also add to one whole, constituting the third moment of time. Rather, adding all of the rest of the infinite series where each next number is the previous number divided by the golden ratio yields, miraculously, the golden ratio.

No, if you want each moment to snap to bounds where every moment of time has twice the number of "pieces" as the previous moment, there is no one ratio where you can divide every piece by a formulaically derived ratio to get the size of the next piece.

However, you can derive a perfect equation for a ratio of reduction for the size of each piece if instead of increasing twofold each moment of time, the mathematical size of the universe increases by a factor of euler's number for each moment of time. (Euler's number, for any unaware, is an irrational number like pi or the golden ratio--it goes on forever, only approximated at 2.718. It is the factor used to calculate rate of growth rate as the growth compounds on itself. If you have a dollar with 100% annual growth rate, and compound it only at the end of the year (once), you'll have 2 dollars. If you compound it twice, meaning you'll only apply a 50% growth rate, but you'll do it twice, you'll have 2.25 dollars from the 50 cents you made mid-year experiencing 50% growth during the second compounding. Compound 4 times a year (1.25)^4 and you get about 2.44. Compound an infinite number of times and you get the irrational number e.)

So, if the universe's size increases by a factor of e every moment instead of a factor of 2, you can find an equation that creates a ratio which smoothly descends from the golden ratio, approaching 1, as the ratio that each unit needs to be divided by the previous unit to prevent any division between moments of time if they were unraveled back into a single continuous string rather than 4-dimensional space. And we start thinking about the internals of moments of time less as discrete units, now that each moment has an irrational unit size, and think more around a descending density as you move from each moment of time to the next. But a vastly increasing size offsets the density to keep the sum total of any moment identical to the total value of any other moment.

But this does not yet explain why matter or the fundamental forces exist to begin with, how that 4D manifold is supposed to emerge from this theoretical curve. And the answer is that there are an infinite number of possible curves that can fit this ratio regression. There's the simplest one, which solves the problem as simply as possible. But what if you add a sine wave to that? Within the bounds of a moment, the sine wave will go up and also down, canceling out any potential change in density totals. But maybe this is slightly less likely than the more simple curve. And a sine wave that goes up and down twice, with a frequency of 2, even less likely. And the higher amplitudes, higher frequencies, all even less likely, but still possible.

But why would the universe be calculating frequencies of sine waves as probabilities? And I believe it's not so much a calculation as it is a natural relationship between the positive and negative directions, starting at 0. If you have a moment where the size is e to the power of 0, its size is 1. And you can proceed with the universe I described where the size increases by e every moment, trending toward infinity, or you can move backwards on the number line where e to the higher negative powers trends toward 0. The math should all be the same, but inverted. An equal but opposite anti-verse. I believe that matter arises from interactions between the shared probability of what is likely to happen in either universe at any given moment of time. And from either universe's perspective, they both see themselves as the positive direction where the math of space trends toward infinity and the other universe is the one that gets smaller and smaller. But because they both look the same internally, they are effectively the same universe, thus the shared probability.

So, these infinite frequencies and amplitudes of sine waves overlaid on top of the lowest energy curve create stable collections of frequencies also known as eigenstates, which can be combined into the sort of manifold Hartle and Hawking described, where 4D space and time becomes an emergent relationship between the underlying waveforms of probability and the spatial organization of layers and layers of mathematical curves that are not identical but do rhyme, in our universe seen as fundamental particles.

That is what I believe. I think we're living in virtual spacetime continuum that emerges to more coherently organize huge swaths of mathematical probability waves that in concert represent what might or might not be at any given level of complexity.

Which seems like a lot of words to explain that we definitely don't exist for sure because the fact that we're here indicates we only probably exist.

Great. Glad we cleared that up.

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 10 points 14 hours ago

Oh, Britta's in this?

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

"Too bad there's not enough left over to pay for my arthritis meds so I can drive. Hey, whatever happened to that medical aid program that used to pay for them?"

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

Nobody threatens our Earth and gets away with it. And now we find out Venus was harboring these asteroids all along? Too far. My kids live here. I know this is drastic, and hear me out, it's not often our whole planet gets threatened. If there was ever a time, this is the time to be drastic.

We need to get rid of Venus.

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 83 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He's moved on to another plane.

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

Patrick, that's not where eyelashes go.

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But the sentence works when put in this order:

972 461 5380

Someone braver than me should dial that number.

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 25 points 2 days ago (18 children)

Or whenever you have to use the ATM.

CASH! Aaah aaah.

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This might be more mainstream than what you're looking for, but this is the video that I think of from that time.

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 22 points 2 days ago

I mean it's pretty obvious if you think about it. They probably ordered a side of continental nuggets and the worker was nice and gave them one of each continent.

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 days ago

I canceled my sub, but sadly not out of principle on the AI thing. I just accidentally hit the button that accepts an upgrade to the family plan and it didn't look like there was an easy way to undo it so I just killed the whole subscription.

11
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Uli@sopuli.xyz to c/lemmyconnect@lemmy.ca
 

A few times lately someone has replied to me and I click on their comment in my inbox to reply back. It takes me to the thread, but only shows a parent or sibling comment, not the reply that was in the inbox. But if I go back to the inbox and click on their profile, I see the comment in their history.

Most recently, this happened to a comment from Azzy@beehaw.org. They sent me a reply telling me about a containers plugin in Firefox and I just want to reply back thanking them for the tip.

Is this a real bug, or is it an artifact of how some instances are not federated with others?

Android 10 Galaxy S9

Edit: Link doesn't seem to lead to their account. Am I linking it wrong?

 
 

Basically anything I copy won't paste into the app. The exception is when I copy a link from an app like YouTube and paste it directly into Connect. But if I paste the same link into a notes app and copy the url from there, nothing happens when I try to paste in Connect.

I'm on a Galaxy S9, Android version 10.

 

🦁🐯🇰🇪

 

magicaltrevor:

Everyone loves Magical Trevor 🧙‍♂️

Cuz the tricks that he does are ever so clever

Look at him now

Disappearing a cow 🐄

(Where is the cow?) 🤷‍♂️🐄

(Hidden right now) ❓🐄❓

Taking a bow, it's Magical Trevor 🧙‍♂️

Everybody's seen that the trick is clever

Look at him there

With his leathery,

leathery

whip

It's made of magic

And with a little flick—

Yeah, yeah, yeah, the cow is back 🐄😲

Yeah

Yeah

Yeah

The cow is back

Back, back

Back from his magical journey

What did he see? 🤔

🌌 In the parallel dimension 🌌

He saw beans

Lots of beans 🍛

🍛 Lots of beans 🍛

🍛🍛🍛 Lots of beans 🍛🍛🍛

Oh

Beans 🍛

🍛 Lots of beans🍛

🍛🍛🍛 Lots of beans 🍛🍛🍛

🍛 Lots 🍛 of 🍛 beans 🍛

Yeah, yeah...

goto magicaltrevor;

view more: next ›