WalnutLum

Man I wonder how they set it up to where they don't know who runs it

Depends on the training and the output.

Just like if you photographed the Mona Lisa in such a way as it recreated the piece as if it wasn't a photograph, a model sufficiently trained that can reproduce the original training data, you have copyright issues.

Problem is that many models can do this, but it's a mathematically improbable occurrence.

If I make a stamp that's made of 1 billion exact copies of different copyrighted photos and cut it infinitesimally small, and mixed it up, the problem that it can produce the original work that it was made from still becomes a copyright issue.

You'd have to prove the opposite, in fact. That it's mathematically impossible for your model to reproduce the copyrighted content for it not to be an issue

The newest TikTok trend and thus drug problem seems to be centered around galaxy gas. And they seem to know what they're doing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiebBVQBulI

Main thing the US gets from Israel is Market Capital Export.

Israel accounts for what, like 30-40% of all recent American acquired startups?

I think Steam does have enough influence to be able to pull a sizable chunk of users away from windows.

It seems like a very polarizing game, you either really enjoy it or not at all.

I love the division 1 and 2 but the first game had some MAJOR bullet soak issues for the first half-year of the game's lifetime.

Massive always does good work despite Ubisoft, in my opinion.

Biggest issue I see is that these LLMs tend to repeat themselves after a surprisingly short number of times (unless they're sufficiently bloated like ChatGPT).

If you ask any of the users of Sillytavern or RisuAI they'll tell you that these things have a long tail of not being very creative.

It's important to take Tesla and SpaceX at face value and not to extrapolate future success based on what they've accomplished.

Edit: for anyone that follows SpaceX's current shenanigans, seems like they've been using the FAA to scoot permits to launch without proper authorization from other agencies (notably the EPA)

Shit is getting VERY juicy: https://fixupx.com/RepKiley/status/1839066996274516417

They've even got representatives just kind of going along with their demonstrably false narrative for the ride.

Oh, yes but the DRM exemption clause means that you can backwards engineer the changes and continue releasing them under GPL

Edit: as an example we should probably be looking at the duckststion situation evolving right now:

https://vimuser.org/duckstation.html

"releasing the modified version to the public" would cover them re-closing the source and then subsequently releasing that newly closed source, so they can't relicense it and then release the built version of the code.

At least not easily, this is where court history would likely need to be visited because the way it's worded the interpretability of "modified" in this context would need to be examined.

Do you mean finetune data?

A model's configuration data is training data.