overview for WldFyre

What's a technology that was cooler in its older iterations? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

Alan Wake 2 and Control are fantastic!

Continuing the habit in c/funny@sh.itjust.works

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you can't laugh at a joke then I swear by my pretty floral bonnet, I will end you.

I refuse defeatism in c/memes@slrpnk.net

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'd argue not, you can't have reproducible experiments with control groups. You can't really follow the scientific method with economics and politics.

I refuse defeatism in c/memes@slrpnk.net

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It's not scientific lol

Meeting the 3rd party candidates in c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What a weird reply to someone who only stated facts.

Internet Archive breached again through stolen access tokens in c/technology@lemmy.world

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

Someone else looked to the group claiming responsibility for this. It's a pro-Palestinian Russian group

How to clean a rescued pigeon in c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It's a turn of phrase lol

Remedy's multiplayer Control spinoff looks even weirder than I expected: A co-op FPS where you shoot goo and garden gnomes at murderous monsters from another dimension in c/games@sh.itjust.works

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Remedy has been working on this game for years, and it looks like Control, not like a random paranormal game IMO. If you haven't played Control then I can't recommend it enough! It is such a fun game with a unique and incredible atmosphere.

What financial woes?? I didn't know Remedy had any financial problems?

What beliefs or hypotheses do you hold strongly despite not feeling confident that you can necessarily prove or evince it? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

What "evidence"? Lmfao what the fuck are you talking about?

What beliefs or hypotheses do you hold strongly despite not feeling confident that you can necessarily prove or evince it? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

I'd argue we have lots of evidence that people who believe things strongly without evidence are dumb.

This is a thought experiment "Ball on a Table" for detecting whether someone has Aphantasia. What do you see when you perform this experiment? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

I have aphantasia, and people really struggle to comprehend what it means or what it's like. Now to be fair, I don't really comprehend how people without aphantasia think or process things either.

Were your front forks resting on the ground, or up in the air?

No idea, all I could think was that the front tire was missing, it didn't occur to me to think how that affected the bikes position.

Was there any other damage done to your bike or to the lock?

I didn't think about there being any damage.

Are there any other bikes nearby? People nearby? Security cameras that might have caught the crime?

I had just thought of a bike rack with only my bike, no people or other bikes nearby. Looking for security cameras seems obvious now that you mention it, but I didn't think of that. If you had said "what advice would you give if your friend walked out and found their bike had been stolen/vandalized" I probably would have thought of that, but trying to think of an abstract situation is much more difficult for me.

This is a thought experiment "Ball on a Table" for detecting whether someone has Aphantasia. What do you see when you perform this experiment? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

With all due respect, I don't believe aphantasia is a real thing.

It does, it's a studied and proven condition. No idea why you wouldn't believe it lol