As a rule, a man who has never worked a day in his life- should have no authority over those who do.
If their victim died in terror, yes. They are.
Definitely pregonate.
That was two words.
Meanwhile, Death Stranding 2 is just days from launch.
It’s not really a huge loss. MWS is basically a watered down .ml.
“Ideological” pretty much covers everything else. A threat to kill is an act of terrorism.
I think what’s happening here, is that murder has become so normalized that we have reached a point where the word “terrorism” has to have some special definition that excludes it from the regular run-of-the-mill terror one would experience when they’re life is threatened for whatever reason.
I mean, would you feel terror if someone threatened your life in a way that you truly believed you were in danger?
Oh, and she sung a song in Spanish, and was threatened with death for not singing in American English. That screams political to me…
“Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims.”
So… no, I think I got it right. I mean, its root is from the Latin word- “terror”. A threat of death is sure to cause such a feeling in most people. So- in this form, the threat illustrates the act of one person terrorizing another. Therefore- one who terrorizes is a terrorist by definition.
This is not a stretch to arrive at this conclusion. That it sounds foreign might be a result of the normalization of violence.
The Supreme Court in-and-of-itself, is a setback to transgender rights.
view more: next ›
I’m not changing the definition. I’m simply explaining my interpretation of it. Threats of murder are a form of terrorism.
If a person that plays guitar is called a guitarist, then a person that terrorizes others is a terrorist.
It’s pretty simple.