"Good code" is not well defined and your example shows this perfectly. LMDBs codebase is absolutely horrendous when your quality criterias for good code are Readability and Maintainability. But it's a perfect masterpiece if your quality criteria are Performance and Efficiency.
Most modern Software should be written with the first two in mind, but for a DBMS, the latter are way more important.
No, it's a car that breaks down once you go faster than 60km/h. It's extremely useful if you know what you're doing and use it only for tasks that it's good at.
Mit Höllenfeuer!
Docker is (simplified) a VM built from a single file. You can use it to host your website on a server that runs a docker daemon (pretty much guarantied nowadays). But it won't be useful in developing the website itself.
But seriously, this sounds so much like a ChatGPT promt, why didn't you ask that in the first place.
This made me chuckle. It's so goddamn accurate 😂
Naww, look who's butthurt because the joke found its target ;)
Naja, eigentlich ist es ganz einfach. Ich schau' mir das an und sagen den Leuten klipp und klar, das Zeug ist nicht fixbar. Entweder wir schreiben die Anwendung komplett neu, oder sie können sich nen anderen Dienstleister suchen. Wer billig bezahlt, bekommt eben billig!
This has to be one of the worst graph designs I've seen since the Alpecin ad. It took me a whole minute just to figure out what data was what.
Codeberg has used way stricter rate limiting since pretty much forever. Nice thought, but Codeberg will not solve this problem, like at all.
Also das T kann auch bleiben 😁
Marge: "Warthunder, no!" Bart: "What?" Marge: "Sorry force of habit."
I know, commenting is bad because it signals interest, but still...
Yes, that's exactly the point. AI is terrible at writing code unsupervised, but it's amazing as a supportive tool for real devs!