adminofoz

joined 1 year ago
[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago

I dont know if it's any consolation but I was also disappointed in better help and also found that therapists are generally not good. Ive found the people who tell me to go therapy have either never been or are the kind of person who doesn't use critical thought frequently.

[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hey its the guy people were accusing of being Pugs alt. Funny seeing you here.

[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Why is all the drama always about one guy. I think this is at least the third "front page" post I have seen involving drama with this guy in just a few months.

Can't we just implement some reasonable go touch grass cooldown period. No modding or posting from that account or IPs associated with his account for 90 days.

If its a problem as soon as he's back then 180 days next time.

[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I agree with you on banning PACs and corps from spending on and engaging in campaigns.

My point is you aren't going far enough. If you think $100 million spent for a candidate in 2002 is an ideal worth striving for or somehow equal to no money in politics, you are in for disappointment or you don't remember that era well enough.

This still nearly entirely excluded normal people from becoming a candidate. Corporations were still writing our laws during that time through lobbying. Not to mention a dozen other in roads for money in politics during that era, such as insider trading.

[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Im with you on Citizens United being a nightmare but if I understand your argument and your chart you are saying 100s of millions per election to politicians equals "banned money in politics." Is that correct?

If so I dont believe we mean the same thing when we say those words.

[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 days ago (4 children)

At first, I thought this was satire. I still don't believe it, but I am willing to be persuaded by new information. Do you or anyone who knows much about this have links or even the name of the legislation?

[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago

This was the go to computer prank for 10 year old boys in the schools computer lab.

Real learning moment.

[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Great way to end up with a medical malpractice lawsuit.

[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Here is the thing, does the corporate entity you work with use Microsoft? Then your password is stored as an NTLM hash in NTDS.dit. That means you are using MD4.

Has anyone in your organization clicked a phishing link? It only takes one weak link to get in. Then it only takes one (Maybe 2) bad configuration for a malicious actor to escalate privileges. Then dump the whole organization passwords from the Domain Controller.

Hope you aren't reusing passwords anywhere.

[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 weeks ago

We fixed SQL injection?

view more: next ›