arctanthrope

ah, a barbarian

aurochs is the singular. aurochsen is plural. notice the similarity to ox/oxen

nyt spoilers:

the word saturnine doesn't refer to the gloomy atmosphere of the planet Saturn. in alchemy, the seven known celestial bodies (the sun, moon, and 5 observable planets) were associated with the seven known metals. Saturn was associated with lead. saturnine means leaden, heavy, etc. and came to mean gloomy by metaphorical association with those terms

Netflix startup sound

honestly seems wild to me that people are pushing back so hard on the idea of having at minimum a small bedroom, as opposed to a cot in a crowded bunk room, or one of those Japanese pod hotels. y'all never seen a college dorm room?

if you could see a version of the movies where everything is exactly the same except one character has a gun instead of their normal weapon, which character would you pick

I'm sure there are better solutions if we assume we can dismantle and rebuild all of society any way we want, along with the attitudes of those who inhabit it, but I think it's worthwhile to consider how current systems could be improved

I'm not talking about my personal vision of utopia, I'm talking about the bare minimum of a society that can begin to be considered just, even in a very hollow sense

I've always believed that everyone should be able to have, for free, a permanent private living space of at least 80sqft, a reasonably comfortable bed, access to a toilet and shower and associated toiletries, clothing suitable for the weather, water and food (even if only some flavorless nutritional paste), and access to medical care both as-needed and on a regular basis. if you have no ambition in life beyond sitting in that little room staring at the wall and eating soylent, then so be it, for a society to provide any less is immoral

true for smaller sample sizes, but for large normally-distributed sets, such as "all people," the mean and median will be pretty much identical. when you take a larger sample, it's more likely that an outlier on one end will be balanced out by a similar outlier on the other end. e.g. when you measure the height of 50 people, you might happen to end up with one person who's 6'8" and have to account for that, but when you measure the height of 50,000 people, you're more likely to also have someone who's 4'4"