b1ab

joined 2 years ago
[–] b1ab@lem.monster 10 points 2 years ago

The report is very light on comparative data. It does look cherry picked. I’d be much more interested in a real piece of research. I do see the point of CCDHs claims. But it’s pretty weak. Free speech has some uncomfortable aspects that the general populace doesn’t want to see. Blocking and filters can help tune the fire hose to your individual preferences. For example on X, I filter all the political out of my feed. It’s not that hard, people are just lazy.

[–] b1ab@lem.monster 5 points 2 years ago

Exactly.

Not everyone is on twitter for the political bullshit. Using banned words it’s easy to filter any political garbage. Twitter is quite useful. But I’m not there to convince or push my ideology on a bunch of polarized people. What a waste of energy.

[–] b1ab@lem.monster 5 points 2 years ago

Fuck off already.

[–] b1ab@lem.monster 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

God bless the hackers, crackers, reverse engineers, and disrupters. Pray they help keep you free of too much pain.

[–] b1ab@lem.monster 1 points 2 years ago

2e. We like the role playing more than rolling dice to simulate a pen and paper MMO.

[–] b1ab@lem.monster 1 points 2 years ago

Even more interesting is how will derivative works fit the model. Fun stuff ahead.

[–] b1ab@lem.monster 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just because it’s publicly available on the internet does not mean it is public domain or not covered by copyrights. Attribution may end up being what is needed. A works cited list. I see licensing of works being ingested as a future moneymaker.

view more: ‹ prev next ›