besselj

joined 8 months ago
[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 months ago

Expletives in music and podcasts, mostly. Think about the children 🤡

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Would be amazing if they lost a substantial amount of customers as consequence

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago

🙏🙏🙏

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Taco probably won't do it anyways

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago

Am I out of touch? No, its the faculty who are wrong.

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 280 points 5 months ago (14 children)

Safety concerns aside, you should trust your partner enough to not need to track them

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 37 points 5 months ago (6 children)

The tracking happens even with a big reflector/scatterer on your head, but as long as you dont wear it regularly, the system would have difficulty identifying you from wave propagation alone

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 156 points 5 months ago (10 children)

Ironically, a tin foil hat would probably work to prevent that kind of surveillance

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 40 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Big AI companies pretty much exclusively sell LLMs that output unreliable data, so idk how much of a worry it is anymore.

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Another interesting deterrent is to poison unruly scrapers with infinite nonsense via Markov chains https://algorithmic-sabotage.github.io/asrg/trapping-ai/

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The hyperscalers will probably just slap a bandaid on their models and implement guardrails that can be easily evaded

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I wonder what the success rate is if you verify using AI generated faces (assuming they cheap out and you dont have to provide camera access)

view more: ‹ prev next ›