The best executives are very strong generalists, and the best managers are chosen to be strong performers in the task that they are managing other people to do. Elon is widely known to be a strong engineer, as well as a strong designer, and spends much of his time arguing details of that kind of work with his reports. Mark Zuckerberg is known to do similarly.
LO fuckin' L
Via Reddit!SneerClub: "Investors’ ‘dumb transhumanist ideas’ setting back neurotech progress, say experts"
I'd go for Motoko Kusanagi's prosthetic body, myself, as long as I could afford the upkeep. That whole "don't darken your Soul Gem" thing would go terribly for me.
Whatever marginal utility genAI has in mathematics, like being a shitty version of a semantic search engine, is outweighed by the damage it is doing to critical thought at large. "Ooh, the bus to the math conference runs so smoothly on this leaded gasoline!"
Reasoning With Machines doesn’t work on reasoning, really. It’s almost entirely large language models — chatbots. Because that’s where the money — sorry, the industry interest — is. But this paper got into the NeurIPS 2025 conference.
A reminder that the NeurIPS FAQ for reviewers says that "interactions with LLMs" are an acceptable way "to enhance your understanding of certain concepts". What other big conferences are there... AAAI 2026, you say?
AAAI-26 will follow a two-phase reviewing process as in previous years, with two additions: an additional AI-generated review in Phase 1, and an AI-generated summary of the discussions at the end of the discussion phase. The AI-generated content is being used as part of a pilot program to evaluate the ability of AI tools to assist in the peer review process.
I'm gonna say it: The entire "artificial intelligence"/"machine learning" research field is corrupt. They have institutionally accepted the bullshit fountain as a tool. It doesn't matter if they're only using chatbots as a "pilot program"; they've bought into the ideology. They've granted fashtech a seat at the bar and forced all the other customers to shake its hand.
Was there ever, like, a push by Falun Gong to whitewash their articles? I seem to recall gossip from somebody (maybe in a skeptics' group) about that, but I have no idea where in Wikipedia's deep drama holes to look for evidence of it.
How do you write like this?
The first step is not to have an editor. The second step is to marinate for nearly two decades in a cult growth medium that venerates you for not having an editor.
Hasn't Falun Gong had beef with Wikipedia for a long time? I have a vague recollection of reading about that, but I do not know where.
The only nice feeling here is that of every joke we science students made about the management school being validated.
I still say that the term "scientific racism" gives these fuckos too much credit. I've been saying "numberwang racism" instead.