bss03

You see, I'm a "no code" developer. /s

I'm a programmer, and I've heard many programmers advocate for using "AI". I surround myself with those that reject it (primarily for ethical reasons), but the ones at my last job seemed to like it.

Anyway, the whole industry has actually been built on vibes for at least a generation. C is bad. JS is worse. We have better languages that had better tooling and better semantics since before either of those were invented, but they were ignored in order to build an edifice to Capital on sand. Since then, the actual computer scientists (that study that branch of mathematics) have made much better languages and done studies to provide evidence they are easier to learn and produce a lower fault rate. That has been consistently ignored.

Adopting "AI" is just another step before the whole industry collapses, and we restart on better foundations and salvage what is absolutely necessary.

I don't know what the next foundation actually is, or how stable it can even be when it's built on this von Neumann trash instead of a proper Harvard Architecture. /s (I hope the foundation is related to GRTT or QTT.)

Fiddlesticks. "marblegargler" is perfectly cromulent. ;)

Is that a dictionary for witches? Or did you misspell wiktionary?

• Nestle, Part 1: Bad for your Food
• Nestle, Part 2: Bad for your Water
• Nestle, Part 3: Bad for your Shelter

Whatever can be destroyed by the truth should be destroyed by the truth. (https://quoteinvestigator.com/2016/03/13/destroy/)

Our good girl has only caught one squirrel, but she never loses them due to speed or even maneuvering, it's because they cross the fence or climb a tree where she can't follow.

She has "caught" a few baby rabbits, that were still trying to hide instead of evade. I'll bet you are right about her being unable to keep up with an mature rabbit.

No, that's like telling the city government they can't have cops arrest people for a law that hasn't passed council.

That's almost literally the opposite of what the judges actually said.

They specifically called out "the use of unfair and deceptive practices", but ruled the FTC has to follow it's own procedures and, in this case, did not.

Once the FTC follows it's own processes and procedures, it can institute the same policy.

Practice. It get to Chestnut's level, it has to be intentional.

3 popeyes sandwiches used the be a common order for me, but I try to eat less these days. Most of my practice was not with purpose of getting better, but I enjoyed the feeling of fullness even as a child and still love a buffet.

Well, maybe I'll try again in the future but I don't currently own a Samsung.

Why are US americans against helping each other ?

For many people "freedom" only occurs when you don't (think you) depend on others.

And, maybe it's just a me issue, but I think a lot of Americans dislike receiving help because in their experience it always costs, and often costs more when the person giving it make it seem free.

But, mostly it's Capitalist / Protestant propaganda that anyone that receives assistance is a moral failure due to the "sin" of laziness.