calcopiritus

Nah. The hate of other people never leaves my body. When driving it's the dumbasses that don't use their blinkers. While walking, it's the people that stay far enough from the wall in order to occupy the most space while staying close enough that you don't fit between the douchebag and the wall.

Engagement based personalized recommendations.

Carbon taxes still allow you to waste as much energy as you want. It just makes it more expensive. The objective is to put a limit on how much they are allowed to waste.

I'm not a lawyer. I don't know how to make a law without possible exploits, but i don't think it would be hard for an actual lawyer to make a law with this spirit that is not easily avoided.

Ah yes, the sphere burger

You can make the limit per-company instead. With big fines if you make thousands of companies to get around the law.

Energy consumption limit. Every AI product has a consumption limit of X GJ. After that, the server just shuts off.

The limit should be high enough to not discourage research that would make generative AI more energy efficient, but it should be low enough that commercial users would be paying a heavy price for their waste of energy usage.

Additionally, data usage consent for generative AI should be opt-in. Not opt-out.

Bulldozing all the houses and building higher density homes is what should be done to fix the housing crisis. And the car-depndency and plenty other issues.

Or doctors. Or almost any other profession. If anything, artists usually have better handwriting because they actually care that their handwriting is pretty.

Why do millionaires pay more taxes than minimum-wage workers?

Whatever answer you come up to my question can probably answer yours.

The alternative is banks hoarding real state without any need to rent it out or sell it soon. They can just wait until prices get higher.

That's why in most countries people pay way less property taxes in the house they live in.

I don't think Microsoft invented scrapping. Or LLM training.

Also, GitHub doesn't have an issue with Microsoft scraping its data. They can just directly access whatever data they want. And rate-limiting non logged in accounts won't affect Microsoft's LLM training at all.

I'm not defending a monopolist because of monopolist actions. First of all because GitHub doesn't have any kind of monopoly. There are plenty of git forges. And second of all. How does this make their position on the market stronger? If anything, it makes it weaker.

No. I cannot find the flaws in my reasoning. Because you are not attacking my reasoning, you are saying that i am on the side of the bad people, and the bad people are bad, and you are opposed to the bad people, therefore you are right.

The world is more than black or white. GitHub rate-limiting non-logged-in users makes sense, and is the expected result in the age of web scrapping LLM training.

Yes, the parent company of GitHub also does web scrapped for the purpose of training LLMs. I don't see what that has to do with defending themselves from other scrappers.