cyan_mess

joined 2 months ago
[–] cyan_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 23 hours ago

Make the men interested in you women, duh.

[–] cyan_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm referring precisely to figures like Joyce and Rowling when I talk about the "terf-feminist divorce". I agree that the modern "gender critical" individuals have little to do with feminists, and they themselves are moving away from the classic moniker too. But as a movement, I'm aiming for just the contrary, underlining the "feminist" in terf. remembering that terf stems from feminism points a finger at the failures of white, straight, upper-middle class feminism. I think it leads to much more useful discussion than trying to restrict a movement to its foundational authors and texts.

[–] cyan_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

When those ideas were injected into the movement so early in its history, was it coopted by bad actors or actively shaped by them?

It's true that Dworkin wasn't anti-trans, even if the transphobic ideas of her time seep into her work, as we see in the paternalistic attitude present in this passage. However, we have a few years, a decade at best, of radical feminism being trans-ambivalent before terfism became a prominent part of the movement. And that's gone on for almost five decades. Even with the current terf-feminist divorce of the last decade, prominent contemporary authors that identify as radfem, such as Amelia Valcárcel, are quite transphobic.

Compare that to intersectional feminism. Even if Hooks' foundational Feminist Theory contains questionable elements in her argumentation (like saying, or at least implying that gays and lesbians don't suffer systemic oppression), she herself revised those ideas in later works and later trans feminist authors got grandmothered into the current.

[–] cyan_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago

"God blessed me by making me transsexual for the same reason God made wheat but not bread and fruit but not wine, so that humanity might share in the act of creation." - Daniel Mallory Ortberg

[–] cyan_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Plus, the 1948 definition of genocide only qualified racial, ethnic, national and religious groups as possible victims of genocide. LGBTQ people were defined out of the genocide they were suffering. Quite comfy for the Allies back then, and to Holocaust denialists and gender critical ideologists today.

[–] cyan_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The greatest achievement of gender critical ideology is getting women to voluntarily give men jurisdiction to police their bodies and presentation.

[–] cyan_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 6 days ago

Now the signatures have to be verified by each member country's authorities. Unverifiable support may bring the petition back under 1M signatures. Sign if you haven't! Keep spreading!

[–] cyan_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago

Less than 50k signatures left, please sign and share if you haven't yet!

[–] cyan_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Countries that have reached and exceeded their minimum signature threshold: Belgium, Spain, Finland, France, Ireland, Netherlands.

 

From Dr. Chris Noone's Bluesky: "Just out! Our peer-reviewed critique of the Cass Review has been published by BMC Medical Research Methodology. Please read and share. We show that the Cass Review is fatally flawed and should not be the basis for policy or practice in transgender healthcare."

[–] cyan_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

In other news, water is wet.

[–] cyan_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago

Cass Review 2: now with more ChatGPT

165
DNA rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
 
view more: next ›