cyberblob

AfD, BSW, SPD. Ich verstehe nicht, wie man derzeit ernsthaft Russlandfreund sein kann. Aber vielleicht übersehe ich auch etwas.

In Zeiten extremer Meinungspolarisierung ist es Bürgerpflicht alles zutun, um aus seinen Meinungssilos auszubrechen und den Versuch zu starten eine ganzheitlichere Meinungsbildung zu gewährleisten.

Warum? Wer sich in Echokammern zurückzieht leistet einer verdummten, unfairen, undifferenzierten Gesellschaft Vorschub. Anstatt nach Wahrheit und einer sinnvollen Erklärung zu streben, steht dann die Verleumdung eben dieser im Vordergrund. Wer nicht bereit ist andere Meinungen respektvoll zu hören, wer nicht bereit ist seine Meinung ggf. zu ändern bereitet denen einen Weg an die Macht, denen Wahrheit nichts bedeutet.

In einer Echokammer zu verharren macht einen persönlich arm und auch die Gesellschaft.

So far I have worked on many different projects, seeing many different approaches to modern web application development including among others:

Thymeleaf, Freemarker, ZK, Angular2, Vue.js, React and Vaadin

to facilitate rendering of a UI. Obviously, there are always advantages and disadvantages and different paradigms involved.

With all the advantages that do exist with modern js frameworks, it also almost always feels like a lot of bloat and overhead to me to work with these frameworks.

More recently, I did work with Vaadin, and as a Java developer at heart, I rarely felt that much „at home“ for creating a UI.

I have to admit, it is still quite handy to know your js and css for special behaviours and edge cases, but something in me just loves working with Vaadin.

So now we can talk a lot about Performance and stuff, but Vaadin‘s simplistic approach is imho very much appealing to people who Like Java.

It might not be the best fit for everything, but it can surely get you far, and it seems that indeed quite a few companies are leveraging its advantages.

I am curious, anyone else with a positive opinion about Vaadin out there?

Best

Hey fellow humans,

I just recently discovered Lemmy. I had an understanding of the general existence of the "Fediverse" for some time, but never gave it much thought. Over the past months or so I read a lot on Reddit and by shear accident discovered Lemmy during that time, as a more federated, free alternative to big-corp Reddit.

Do not get me wrong. I am not per se opposed to big corporations. I am a bit more critical with those corporations that are mainly involved with information and data processing, so basically big-tech.

Now here I am, freshly registered to a german instance and I wanted to share my first impressions of Lemmy or the "Lemmy network".

First off, Lemmy seems great. It has a nice and clean UI and its easy to understand.

But, tbh I already had a bad feeling when it came to choosing an instance to register to. Will I be basically at the mercy of whoever runs that server (with what I am allowed to say at least locally)? What happens when that person or group decides to shut down the server over night? Will my account still be valid elsewhere? How does this work?

One could argue, well what happens when Reddit turns off their website; And of course on Reddit I am also at the mercy of moderators; From a single user perspective there always seems to be the single point of failure in both alternatives. But from my experience, "money makes the world go round", meaning: If there is a legitimate business case it is more likely that such a website or instance will stay online, whereas a lonesome enthusiast will likely loose interest after a while. And then its all gone (at least for that instance)? Is Lemmy than a sub-optimal Reddit alternative?

After registration I noticed something additionally "disturbing". There seems to be a big divide in the Lemmy community, as the instances are free to block certain instances. And I read here, about how big this problem apparently is. Hence, it is not about a big blocklist for unwanted instances, it is also about general focus of conversations across instances.

In fact, this puts me again at the mercy of any instance administrator what I am allowed to see or interact with. Is that not a contradiction of a rather free and open network? It appears anti-liberal in some sense. And a liberal digital society is what we would all strive for, I guess?

Ultimately, this would mean I would have to run my own instance to avoid the risk attached to this situation. But the extreme case of that would be that we are all running our own instances. That does not make sense at all. Then everyone runs and instance and we are all more or less blocking each other.

I guess there is no clean way of doing this? And in the end platforms like Lemmy are always formed by the people who drive them. Hence, personal opinions will always play a role.

But I think a liberal real life society goes to show how things should be: There are rules, but freedom of speech is very much emphasized. For me ideal communication involves that everyone can speak their mind. But then, there are certainly somewhere limits.

I am all against safe spaces, but I am pretty much for respectfulness, indulgence, fairness and constructive dispute. I do not fear any argument that is told in the pursuit of having an honest conversation, an exchange of arguments and ideas.

I would even say, when we are hindering ourselves of having this kind of honest dispute, we are loosing our developed societies.

On the other hand (like in the real world) simply insulting people should not be tolerated.

So, I wonder, is this place actually for me, apparently as a rather liberal person?

Is Lemmy liberal enough from your perspective?

Do you have insights or answers with regards to my questions or blind spots?

Thank you in advance and see you around!

I recently move to openSUSE from Ubuntu, because I simply felt a bit awkward with Canonical. Now you could say there is SUSE behind openSUSE as well, and the world is not perfect. That is true, but I really do not like the fact that Canonical would receive any of my data, as irrelevant as it might seem. I also rather happily pay for a product than unintentionally share data with a corporation. Now that said, Ubuntu is still a great OS and you can turn off telemetry and as a pragmatic computer user I have nothing against snaps.

Still there were some minor points that added to the aforementioned awkward feeling and made me switch: 1.) An annoying dysfunctional bluetooth connection to my headphones 2.) An extremely short battery life on my Thinkpad 3.) General performance felt not as good

Now coming to openSUSE. I knew the distro from years ago and thought I give it another try. And I was not disappointed. After some years of rudimentary Linux experience (mostly Ubuntu and Linux Mint) I can even appreciate openSUSE more than ever.

There are certainly a lot of soft facts that let you choose openSUSE:

• It is easy to install, still leaves you room to play around with stuff.
• It has a pretty stable KDE integration (which leads to a great DE experience)
• It has a good community behind it
• It is mostly based out of central europe (#dataprivacy)
• Rollbacks are just great and already saved my ass

I am not sure whether I would recommend it for newbies altogether, despite it being really stable, it still has the look and feel of a distro for an intermediary skillset. This is mostly because of the look and feel of the installer and YaST. Maybe it has to do with the fact that you certainly would need to use the console from time to time. But then again, at least Tumbleweed is advertised as such a distro. Hence, no one can really complain about these things.

I am using IntelliJ and Podman a lot, the experience under Ubuntu was a bit better, as it really just worked out of the box (with snaps). For openSUSE it took some tweaks so that everything works (out of Flatpaks). Might be an unfair comparison, but being productive easily is still a good measure. Using IntelliJ wo Flatpak was an annoyance, so therefore I have chosen the Flatpak path ;)

But putting in a little effort to make the IntelliJ stuff work was worth it since the overall performance is MUCH better. Of course it could be due to different DE, but it still just feels great to work on openSUSE. And indeed battery life is much, much better. I did not do any measurements, but I would say we are talking at least about 30% improvement (and yes I had TLP installed on Ubuntu).

Additionally, Bluetooth worked flawlessly (like everything else I was doing so far).

There was one little bug though with my background in the lock screen that somehow did magically change for a while.

Gaming with Steam also works easily, although you might need to change codecs for headphones in order to hear stuff. But I had a similar problem under Ubuntu.

As usual differences in distros sometimes are marginal, at least for the non-Linux nerd-faction, so for me its really the mixture of the philosophy behind, the performance, how easy I can do and understand things.

Overall, great experience with openSUSE. I can recommend. Would be great to hear responses to my experience.